67894 – Assessment InformationSubject Code: BUS606Subject Name:

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Assignment Details:
Assessment InformationSubject Code: BUS606Subject Name: Business Research Proposal Topic Selection, Justification and PresentationAssessment Title: Assessment 1 – Individual PresentationWeighting: 15 %Total Marks: Length: 15Minimum of 10 slides (+- 10%)Due Date: Submission due Week 6– Sunday at 11.59 pmCOURSE: Master of Business (Research)Unit: Business Research Proposal and Literature ReviewUnit Code: BUS606Type ofAssessment: Assessment 1 – Individual PresentationUnit Learning Outcomes addressed: (a) Demonstrate an advanced ability to identify, assimilate, and review applications of, particular research techniques.(b) Identify various means of data collection that are feasible and can be ethically enacted.(c) Articulate and critically evaluate differences between alternative research methodologies.(d) Explain how research outcomes may be affected by the nature and application of particular research techniques.(e) Demonstrate an advanced ability to construct a robust methodology for addressing a research question.(f) Explain how the use of selected methodologies is relevant to a specific research proposal.Criteria for Assessment: • Understanding of the proposed project• Evidence of analysis• Organisation and use of visual aids• Non-verbal & verbal communication skillsAssessment Task: Students are to select their proposed research topic for the Master of Business Research thesis and make a presentation to the class for at least 10 minutes followed by question and answer. The presentation is required to use PowerPoint slides.Submission Date: Week 6– Sunday at 11.59 pm (online submission) of the PowerPoint presentation slide deck.Total Mark & Weighting: 15 marks | 15%Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or approved extenuating circumstances incur a 5% penalty per calendar day,calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 15 will incur a 1.75 mark penalty per calendar day.Assessment 1– Individual Presentation. Presentations will be made during the scheduled class time.Assessment DescriptionStudents are required to select a proposed research topic for their Master of Business Research thesis that is aligned to one of the seven Research Clusters in the School of Business as listed below. Students are required to make a presentation for 10 minutes to the class on their proposed research topic and answer questions from the class and the lecturer. Students must conduct extensive research on the topic and must cite relevant sources to support their research proposal.The MBR Research Clusters are:• Cluster 1: Leadership and Management of Large Corporations• Cluster 2: Leadership and Management of Not-for Profit Organisations• Cluster 3: Leadership and Management of Start-ups, SMEs and Family Business• Cluster 4: Leadership and Management of Technological and Digital Transformation• Cluster 5: Leadership and Management of Sustainable Business Operations• Cluster 6: Leadership and Management of Government and Multilateral Organisations• Cluster 7: Leadership and Management of Tourism and Hospitality OrganisationsThe PPT presentation should address at a minimum the following points:1. The proposed title of the research project (maximum 12 words)2. The Research Cluster of the project3. The research objective4. The motivation for conducting the research5. A justification of the importance and significance of the research project6. An overview of the relevant literature and prior research concerning the proposed research project7. The proposed method for collecting data and other evidence when executing the research project8. Discussion of expected challenges and proposed solutions to these challenges when conducting the research9. The expected contribution to the field of knowledge from undertaking the research10. Reference list comprising a minimum of 10 referencesPresentation requirements:• A PowerPoint presentation in class with a minimum of 10 slides• The PowerPoint presentation must go for a minimum of 10 minutes. Please allow an additional 5 minutes for questions time if requested by your lecturer or other students in the class.• Your PPT should be converted into PDF and uploaded via Turnitin on the Sunday of the Presentation week.• Appropriate and accurate use of the APA referencing system for in-text citation as well as a reference listYou must use a minimum of 10 references. These must be authoritative and comprise of primarily academic references (e.g. journal article or textbook) or other authoritative sources such as government reports.Criteria HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% DN (Distinction)75%-84% CR (Credit) 74%-65% P (Pass)50%-64% F (Fail)0%-49%Understanding of theproject3 marks Builds a convincing argument showing how all key points are integratedtogetherUses examples to elaborate on the key points and theoryBuilds a convincing argument showing how key issues, analysis, and recommendations areintegrated togetherIncludes all issues,analysis andrecommendations but withlittle elaborationNot integrated with theory or are not justifiedIncludes some issues butanalysis glossed overTeam seemed uncomfortable to go beyond key facts.Key points left outNo grasp of issues that faced the client. Over-reliance on notesEvidence of analysis5 marks Able to use references to back up claims and recommendations madeRecommendations clearly come from the analysis of the project.Evidence of extensive research and analysis: journals, prescribed text, other books, verified websites, primary researchUsed references to justify analysisBackground research and analysis of this is clearlyidentifiableSteps used are shown and some rationale for the development ofrecommendationsprovidedSteps used in the analysis shown but little justification why or how these are used to developrecommendationsNo references to any sourcesSuggestions/recommendations just seem to appear.Organisation and Use ofvisual aids5 marks Ideas are clearly organised so audience can follow easily. The purpose of the presentation is clear in all stages and there is a seamless transition between speakers.Graphics and text are well integrated into the presentation. The text is appropriate for the content and room size.Visual presentation complements rather thandominates presentationMain ideas are presented in a logical manner. Flow of presentation is smooth between speakers.Shows that the group hasworked collaborativelyText clearly summarises the key points. Graphics and text do not distract attention from the speaker or content. Use of visual aids is consistent across the entire presentation.Main ideas are presented in a logical manner. Flow of presentation may be awkward. Group members demonstrate that they have worked on the presentation as a whole. All group members take an equal share in presentation.Group uses graphics but often differs from a verbal presentation. Not summarised so presenters end up reading off-board.Differing styles with differing speakers.Ideas are not focused. Audience may have difficulty following argument. Main points are difficult to identify. There is no transition between key points. There is an awkward transition between speakers.Presentation appears to be done by individuals rather than group.Group uses graphics but is not supported by text or presentation. Text is too dense – too much info on a slide.Differing styles withdiffering speakers No structure to the presentationAudience cannot follow sequenceNo introduction or conclusionApparent that group is notworking well togetherGroup members missing(without valid reason) or notcontributingPresents content with noPowerPoint or overhead slidesNon-verbaldelivery2 marks & Verbal Constantly looks ataudienceShows enthusiasm for their work and how this will helpthe clientAll group members use a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audiencemembers can hearActs in a very professionalmannerGenerally, presenter looks at audience duringpresentationShows expression consistent withpresentationUses gestures to point out or highlight presentationmaterialsAll voices are clearOccasionally looks at audience duringpresentationVoice is generally clearGenerally, speaks directly to the audienceSome reading off the boardSome group members difficult to understandbecause of rushed speechOnly focuses attention on one particular part of the audience, does not scanthe audienceVoice is lowConstantly talks to theboard, not the audienceSome use of filler wordsAudience members havedifficulty hearingDoes not attempt to look at the audience at all, reads notes the entire timeDistracting gestures (fidgeting) while presenting or waiting to presentExcessive use of filler words(e.g. um, er, ah, like)Use of offensive languageUse of slangTotal marks

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services