68067 – C ritical thinki ng, reasoning, and eval uation of evidence('5

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

C ritical thinki ng, reasoning, and eval uation of evidence(‘5 marks)A critical analysis and presentation of the cese study With precise ‘irks betwaer the details and care provided aligning with tha principlas of gal liatwe care practice is formulated. An applicable clinical practice guideline ts selected supporting an excellent critique otthe case study provided. Excellent identification of limitations, omissions art/or inaccuraces of care supported by contemporary credible literature and the se ected Clinical practice Guideline. An applicable clinical practice guideline is selected supporting a very good critique of the case Stuey provided Very good identification of limitations. omissions and/or Inaccuracies of care supported by contemporary credible literature and the selected Clinical Practice Guideline on most occasions. An applicable clinical practice guideline is se ected supporting a good critique ottne case study provided. Good identification of limitations, omissions and/or inaccuracies of care supported by some contemporary credible literature and tne seected Clitmcal practice Guideline on some but not all occasvons. An applicable clinical practice guideline is selected supporting a satisfactory critique of the case study. Satisfactory identification of lit-netions, omissions andfor inaccuracies of care are supported by limited credible literature and the selected Clinical Practice Guideline. An inappropriate clinical practice guideline is selected and does not support a critique of the care provided in the case study.Omissions, limitations and/or inaccuracies are poorly ad dressed Unsatisfactory/ NO Clinical practice guideline is selected. Unsatisfactory critique of tre care provided in the case study Omissions, limitations and-for inaccuracies are not addressed.Sources andReterenci ng(10 Marks) Credible ane relevant references are used comprehensively.Accurate use of APA 7 referencing style in all instances. A range of in-text citations hasbeen used comprenensvely. Crediöle and relevant references are used clearly.Accurate use of APA 7 referencing style on most occasions. A range of in-text citations has been used cleany. Credible ant relevant references are used sou ndly.Accurate use of APA 7 referenc ng style on most occasions. A range of in-text citations has been used soundly. Some credible and relevant references are used.Accurate use of APA 7 referencing style on some occasi ons. There is no variation of in-text citation format. Not all references are credible at-apor relevantMany inaccuracies with the APA 7 referencing style, NO referencesMechanics(Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation) (5 Marks) There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, the meaning IS easily discernible. The critique reads without interru ption. There are minimal errors with grammar, spelling ane punctuation, and the meaning is easily discernible. There are some errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, and tha meaning is easily discernible. There are some errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, that impact readability. The meaning is not always discernible. There are substantial errors Witn grammar, spell Ing and punctuation that impact readability. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are such that the reader cannot make sense of the content.Assessment Critena HD85-100 D 7584 CR64-74 54 N 3549 NNSequencing:Sentence and paragraph structure & intelligibility(15 marks) The content in the critique matcnes the outline presented in the introductory paragraph Organised paragrapns With an excellent progression of ideas. The content flaws from one paragraph to the next on all occasions. The critique enes With a concise, and rational conclusion The content in the critique matches tne outline presented in the introductory paragraph on most occasions. Organisec paragraphs with a very goad progression of ideas. The content flows from one paragrapn to tne next on most occasions. The critique ends with a clear and rational conclusion. The content in the critique matches the outline presented in the introductory paragrapn on some occasions. Some organised paragrapns With a good progression of ideas. The content flaws from one paragrapn to the next on some occasions. The critique ands With a sound conclu Sian. Some content in the critique is in the introductory paragraph. Some organised paragraphs With a satisfactory progression of ideas and content on some occasions, The critique ends With a satisfactory conclusion. Poor or no introductory paragraph,Content flows poorly from one paragraph to the next. The critique coes not enc with a rational conclusion. Unsatisfactory presentation of ideas. No critique evident.Knowledge and understanding(35 marks)The critique provides a well-articulated understandi of how contem p orary evidenced based theory translatas into practical care. Excellent knowledge of National Palliative Care Stand arts aligned with at least ane of NSQHSS N MBA stenoaras are demonstrated using a palliative approach within the critique. Very good knowledge of National Palliative Care Standards aligned with at least one of NSQHSS and/or NMBA stancarcs are demonstrated using a palliative approach within the critique, Good knowledge ofNational Palliative Care Stand arts aligned with at least ane of NSQHSS N MBA stanoaras are demonstrated using a palliative approach within the critique. Satisfactory knowledge ofNational Palliative Care Stancarcs aligned with at least one of NSQHSS and/or NM3A standards is demonstrated using a palliative approach within the critique. Poor knowledgeN atonal palliative Care Stantaras aligned With at least one of NSQHSS and/or NMBA standards are demonstrated usng a palliative approach within the critique. Unsatisfactory knowledge ofNationalPalliative Care Standards demonstrated, no alignmentNSQHSS and/or NM3A standards.Appendix B — Criterion Referenced Rubric: Assessment Task 2 Written CritiqueReferencesThe list of references utilised in this case study can be used as some of the references for your own critique, however also demonstrate depth and breadth of research by using other sources of EBP also.ACV Practice guide/ir72v (20/8) Care o/the Dying Patient. RetrievedAustralian Commission on safety and Quality in Health Care. (202’. National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSCHS). Retrieved from: åLtpsaerbasi, S. , Jackson, D_, & East, L_ (2019). Navigating the maze of research : enhancing nursing and midwifery practice (Fifth edition). Elsevier Australia.Levett-Jones, T. (2018). Learriing to Think Like a Nurse (2nd Ed). Pearson. 2018Nursing Midwifery Beard of Australia. (2018). Registered Nurse Standards Far Praetjee. Retrieved from state mPalliative Care Australia. (201 B)_ National Paffiative Care Standards (5th Ed). Retrieved fromReview Critique the given to patient CPG to SOPPdft VSi_f through additional that Highlight the importance of the National Palliative Care Standards and at least afth2 NSQHSS and/or the NMZÅ Standards and hcn.•e they influence our practiceDemonstrate knowledge on the illness trajectory of Motor Neurone Digease (MNü) in line with Palliative Care Principles link’S the Study CPC to identify highlights limitations inEnsure that your sources are all contemporary (within the last five years) and from evidence based sources) Read all instructions and the rubric very carefuPLEASE NOTE. YOU DO NOT NEED TO INCLUDE ALL OF TEE POINTS ABOVE IN YOUR ESSAY, THESE ARE GIVEN TO YOU TO ENVOKETHOUGHT PROCESS,(Borbasi, Jackson, East, 2019)Clinical Practice GuidelinesCPGlsthey?HOW os to maintain highDO reflection updating CPC’S thrdi-jgh Case StudyAs. described in the Unit Outline you are now required to select an appropriate CPS out of the CPC ‘g that have been provided:The CPC ‘G to a Care of the Dying patientEnd 01 Life CareReview Critique the patient against the CPG your Critique thiOLjgh additional thatHighlight the importance of the Natinal Palliative Care Standards and at least one Of the NSQHSS and/or the NM- Standards and how they influence our practice • Demonstrate knowledge on the illness trajectory Motor Neurone Disease CMND) in line with Palliative Care PrinciplesProvide ‘the Study CPG to identify highlights Of fittii’tatibhS inEnsure that your sources are all contemporary (within the last five years} and from evidence Eased sources) • Read all instructions ane the rubric very carefullyPLEASE NOTE, you DO NOT NEED TO INCLUDE ALL OFTHE POINTS ABOVE IN YOUR ESSAY, THESE ARE GIVEN TO YOU TO ENVOKE THOUGHT PROCESS.Sys t ernatic reviewL meta-Reflection(Levett-Jones, 201 8)Quality of Life ConsiderationsConsider some of the following as you select one of the clinical practice guidelines supplied in the assessments folder to assist you with working through the diagnosis, and journey to the palliative care setting:Rapid diagnosis and dige.ase progression leaves little time to consolidate and prepare for death – spiritual, gacial ane cultural needs must be considered Was an pairi Used?Haw can the family be provided with support and continuing bereavement fallow-up ?Consider the adequate ane detailed use af the SAS tool_Staff provide the patient to aid them in their grief, tb Say gOdåibYé?Are the National palliative Care standards considered in the CPC?Were the NM3A and NOHS gtandar8s eengieered in the CPC?Can ‘the CPC to asgiSt its affiliation With töOIg in the palliative getting?What is your responsibility as an RN to understand the disease trajectory of your patient’s. plan their care and the care of their loved one’s through the knowledge of nursing standards? Was. the Advanced Health Care Plan followed in the eare that was provided?Consider these paints and the many others that you may have also thought of as you reflected on the ease Stuey.RUG-ADL – 17Short, with respiration rate Of 5. Catherine Sitting by Tyler’Séktremities took is ‘-St WithFriday morning — Sunday rnorningTyler was visited 3 times per day by the palliative care team. At different times nurses and social workers Visited.Symptom management included:Break through intermittent pain reliefPressureOyspnoea relief— intermittent use of CPAP combined with 02 therapyMouth caregPegSupport and counselling given to CatheiineSu nday afternoonWhen the palliative care nurse visited Tyler, she found him to be restless and agitated. Tyler stated he was in pain, and he just wanted it all to be over. Tyler asked again after his mother and brothers and the chance of being transferred to the hospice. After a thorough assessment, talking to Tyler and Catherine extensively, the nurse implemented the following:Subcutaneous butterfly (waiting the order far continue-ug analgesia infusion) the hogpiee bedPeg feeds discontinuedCalled Joyce to inform her Tyler’s ean8itionA syringe driver conta ining morphiher haloperidol and onciansetron was eemmeneed after an order was received from the MO.A hospice bed was arranged for transfer Monday afternoon.Joyce and Tyler* brothers were making flight arrangementg to be there asap.MorSi4ie8 KarnafSky Seare – 30RUG-ADL – 17Tyler is now in the Terminal Palliative Care PhageMonday morningUpon arrival of the palliative eare nurse, Tyler appeared still and comfértable. His Sreathing wag short, shallow and laboured with a respiration rate of 5. Catherine wag sitting by Tylertg bedside_ Tyler’s girls were visiting neighbors. Joyce ane Tyler’s brothers were due to arrive at Ipm_At 1025 hrsr Tyler’s respiration rate decreased further: upon inspection, Tyler’s peripheral extrem ities were cyanosed Tyler’g pupils were and dilated, ane he took is last breath withEvaluating and Identifying new problems(Levett-Jones, 201{Levett•JOn 20181)Wednesday afternoonTyler’s peg gite appears to be legg inflamed ane redness has subsidee a little. Tyler remains warm to toue-L RN administered PRN oramorph to aggist with Tyler 8igtregg ane -discomfort. Tyler has. developed a wheeze. Repositioned ta the semi- recumbent position to assigt with breathing. Tyler appeared slightly confused, although wag orientated place, personr ane time. Tyler’s mood appears low. He puts a brave {ace an when hig daughters are araund, however Catherine is natieing a significant difference in his deme.anaur.Thursday morningTyler is visited the Palliative Care Registered Nurse. Catherine is eut dropping the Children at gehoe-l_ Tyler appears to be extremely short breath ane struggling to breathe. 02 2L via NP wag insitu_ The RN applied NIV to assist Tyler with his breathing.Thu•sday afternoonV,åhlen attending to Tyler’s personal cares, Tyler made some requests te the RN. He agke8 for the CPAP machine to be removed, more analgesia for his increased pain and discomfort, he requested {or arrangementg to be made a bee in the hospice ane requested for his mother and brothers to be contacted. The RN spoke with C.atherine regarding contacting Tyler’s extended family. Time was spent with Catherine talking about Tyler’s eon8ition at present_ Tyler was orientated to pergonr place ane time.Catherine did net want to share this time with Jayce and Tyler’s brothers and thereiare did not contact them.Establishing Goals and Taking Action(Levett-Jones. 201 8)(Lovett-Jones. 2018)Wednesday afternoonNational Palliative Care ?NSQHS Standards? NM8A Standards?about trajectory Of motorHow will I recall information previously learnt and understood about this illness?Where are geme 01 the best locations to aecesg EXP ane current standards of care? ig in supporting the patient their What is a SAS Tool?What ig the Problems Severity Score/ (PSS) ig Mcjéi4iee Score?What is a RUG-AOL score?How do I determine the Palliative Care Phage that the patient is in?DO I to Start difficult conversations patient their Supports ‘Aha t about prognosis? What are same af the complications that the patient and family may face?Are there any specifie symptoms that should be looking for when developing a care plan?ig the dies the ‘this patient? What should I expect?Am ready to deal with this?60 1 get RN if IHave I thought enough about my own well being and resilience for this professional specialty?How do I eare for a deceased person? H ow W ill I what to gay?Identifying problems/issuesConsiderations for the Community palli a Care Settingaf these a re continuously being assesedFalls Risk AssessmentPain AssessmentNOK contact detailsHealth Care Directive Modified Karnofsky Score of 3040RUG. AOL 17SAS TOO’ Cmight be need to his familyNational Palliative Care Standards ?NSQHS Standardg?NM3A Stand arc’S?What do I know about the illness trajectory of motor neurone disease?How will [ recall inferr•nation previously learnt ane understood about this illness?Some Of best E3P Current •tare?•Overall decline in patient’s condition on osservatier•L Physically dependent for all activities of daily living. -MOüiCdImitriptyline Smg N octe i alarrheaMultivitamin Suspension mis ODFebrilephalothin n fectionMetronidazele n feetienramorph 5mg 4/24 ain’ Discomfort_ N OtteMicrolax Enema 1 tube an ipation•Patient appears to be orientated to person, place and time. Some confusion at times, most likely due to infection present. -Patient’S Wife Of patient his t is my that the patient’S Wife is recovery Current infec’tidfi_ Rig understanding of the patients condition. -Pa illative Care phagelar Medications icationlazepam Smg Noete nxietyMS Contiri S•.jgpensidthMovicol Sachet onstipationmitriptyline 5mg Natte ialc,rrheaMultivitamin SUGPéhGidttIProcessing InformationReview of Medical Officer from Palliative Care Community ServiceThe f’nedieai (MO) by Registered peg Site infection. It With Tyler the IV antibiotieg_ MO suggested admission ta hospital for treatment, hcnxever Tyler was not keen on this suggestion. After discussing hospital admission with both Tyler and Catherine together, it was decided that this wag not an option_ The Community Palliative Care Team provide further care to Tyler with provision of ‘VAB ‘g in the home. It was arranged for Tyler to have a day vigit to the hospital insertion Of PICC to Of antibiotics.Post review Medical Officer from Palliative Care Community Services:lar MedicatiQ ns ndicationù iazepzm 5mg Noete nRietyMS Cdthtir. Suspe•ngiOthMovicol 1 Sachet on stipationmitriptyline 5mg Noete ialarrheaMiaitiüiterriir. SLjgpengiOthParacetamol lg’amorph 5mg 4/24 ain/ Discomfort10 na dine _ ‘mg Noete ialarrheaI tube O St (patidri1900 hrsRR: 26BP: 120/70SaC2 92% on 2Lmin NPGCS: 14/15lar Ededications icationNO CteMS Contin Suspension Controlled Release mgMovieol 1 Sachet 80 onstipationmitriptyiiae Srrig NO eteMultivitamin SuspensionParaeetamol 1 OIDTemp: 39.2 degreesPatient Notes from Community Nurses over 24-hour Period:-Patient’s mobility has decreased. He is now spending more time in bed secondary to weakness in arms and legs. Increased requirement of care from 1 person to 2 people to transfer patient. Patient appears more SOB. 02 therapy and NV continues. Peg feeds continuing as per regimen. Patient’s mood appears low. Friends in attendance during visit. Patient communicating in short bursts.–Patient RI’ during visit. Patient’s position altered. Patient sleeping for most of nursing Visit. Patient appears more fatigued. Extra analgesia administered as per patients request. Peg feeds continue as per regimen. Wife and youngest child in attendance during visit, Patient appears warm to touch. Fan applied to assist with climate control.–Patient appears very drowsy throughout visit. Patient appears flushed in the face and remains warm to touch. Peg feed disconnected as per regimen. Peg site appears red and inflamed.Swab taken fram Peg site for pathology. Patient appears in discomfort Paracetarnol lgrarn given via peg. Orarnorph 5mg given via PEG. NIV connected. Patient repositioned in bed.Patient’s wife was attending to children during nursing visit. Wife reports spending mare time sleeping throughout the day. Voice message left for doctor review mane. -Dyspha gia Law moodFoot drop left footIncrease demand for N IV02 Therapy Peg FeedsIntermittent in4éetiong Peg siteGathering new InformatiTyler’g •vital signs when visited by the Palliative Care Nurse:0900 hrs24HR: 80120/70Sa02: 2Lmin NP14/15Temp: 38 2 degrees1300 hrs24HR: 70120/70 Sa02: 2Lmin NPccs: 14/15 Temp: 388 degrees1900 hrsCollect Cues and Information(Levett-Jones ZJIpast MedialR) Wrist as. a child• AgthCurrent• Weakness in left and right hands• Increase in ciysponea on exertion and at restHeadachesDygphag iaLOWConstipation12 agoAround 6 months after initial symptoms and 3 months after diagnosis, Tyler’s condition had deteriorated. Tyler now required a walking frame to mobilise. His dyspnoea has increased, he was suffering from headaches and was generally fatigued Tyler was being assessed by a respiratory specialist for the requirement of Non-invasive ventilation especially at night. Tyler naw suffers from dysphagia and was being assessed in consultation with the respiratory specialist and dietician the need far a gastrostomy.agoTyler’s condition has continued to deteriorate. Due to insufficient nutritional intake secondary to dysphasia, Tyler had a gastrostorny inserted. Since insertion, he has had infections at the insertion site. Tyler also requires assistance of NIV mainly at night, however the demand has increased significantly over the last couple of weeks. Tyler’s mobility is limited. He walks intermittently with the use of an aid and one person. His mobility is limited due to progressive foot drop and increased dyspnoea. With his condition worsening, Tyler initiated the difficult conversation with Catherine about his mortality. Catherine is still not accepting of Tyleds condition nar is she wanting the Children to know the extent of Tyler’s condition. Tyler completed an Advanced Health Care Directive and he ensured bath Catherine and his mother Joyce had a copy. Tyler is currently visited weekly by the Community Palliative Care Team and he has daily support from Community nurse to assist with his activities of daily living.Despite Tylerrs progressive physical deterioration and the ongoing tensions with Catherine’s inability to accept his condition. Tyler values the time he gets to spend with his 3 girls. Watching them play together and their interactions are invaluable to Tyler. Tyler has insisted that his mother and brothers are able to visit monthly. When his family visit, Catherine generally takes the girls and leaves Tyler at home. Although this an ideal situation, Tyler has come to accept the conflict between Catherine and Jayce. Tyler is also still in contact with his colleagues fram the Aidarce who visit him freq uently.Consider the Patient SituationTheAndrea (8 Y—ars)Jessie* (5Erin (2a b- time togethet•. With his thig lot OfAfter in his ‘bitL’poth diaghOSig, téh±idri With ‘the relatiOriShipAetiology of Motor Neurone DiseaseMotor neuron disease (MND) is a progregsi•.’e neurological disorder eharaeteriseci by logs 01 motor neurons (Brownv Edwards, 3uekley & Aitken, 2017). There are 4 main types of MND, depending the level of motor neurone involvement ane where symptoms begin. These include:Amyotrophic: lateral sclerosis (ALS) Progressive bulbar palsy CP8P)Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA)Primary lateral sclerosis (PIS)VIND usually leads to death 20-48 months after symptamg begin, however 5%- patients may gurvive for more than 10 years (MND New Zealand, 20181 The onset MND ig usually betv.•een 40 ane 70 years of age and ig more common in men than women by a ratio of (MNO Australia, 2018). The prevalence is appr0Rimately 8.7 in 100 000 in Australia (MND Australi@,2018bMotor neurong in the brainstem anci the spinal eard gradually degenerate. Dead motor neurang cannot produce or transport signalg to museleg_ Consequently, electrical anci chemical messages originating in the brain 80 not reach the muscles to activate them. The typical symptoms far diagnosis MND are limb weakness, eysarthria and dysphagia (Brown et al_, 2017b Muscle wasting and fasciculations results ‘ram the -dener•uation of the muscles ane lack of stimulation ane use. Other symptoms include pain, gleep disorders, spastieity, drooling, emotional liability, depressionr constipation and zesophageal reflux (Brown et al 201 7)_ Death usually results from respiratory tract infection secondary to comprised respiratory function.Throughout the illness trajectory for MND, the patient remains cognitively intact while physically declining. The patient should be encouraged to partake in moderate ihtensity, endurance type exercise for the truck and limbs ag this may help reduce MND spastieity.Nursing interventions include but are not limited to (3rown et al_, 2017):Facilitating eemmunieationReduéing risk af agpirationFacilitating early identification of respiratory insufficiencyDeereaging pain secondary to muscle weaknessDeereaging risk injury related ta fallsProviding diversional activities such as reading anci companionshipHaw do I relate standards to the ease study?This is where your critical thinking and application theory to practice ig requiredr we cannot tell yau how to this, as a final year nursing unit it ig essential that you are aware of hew all these standards, uphold ane maintain, patient eentree care, dignity, patient assessment and safety to name a few Spend some time reviewing these anci map out the ones that yau believe are important for your critique.Students are required to demonstrate an understanding ef how theory translates inte prattieal nursing care and how evidence underpins best practice. Each student will review and critique the eare given in the Cage Stuey provided according to their ehaiee of ONLYONEaf the provided Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPC’s) best suited to the highlighted discussion,Where fid the CES thatyou Bent me to use?You are provided with CPC’s for this task, in this booklet .You need to ehaoge one 04these only to demonstrate the area of eare that you are providing a critique of_ You are not expected to leak for other CPG’s to support your work, however evidence based praetiee 01 peer reviewed journal publications are expected to further reinforce the eritigue_Learning outcomes LOI L05, LC7Haw to s,Lbmit: Electronic Submiggion •via TurnitinReturn Of assig•vment: The asgesgment feedback and grade will be returned via Turnitin_Assessmentcriteria: The asseggment will be marked using the criteria-based rubric. Please note that in-tent citations are included in the we-re count whilst the reference list ig not ineluee8 in the ward count. Words that are more than 10% aver the word count will not he considered- ear, be found in the unit outline in Appendix 8are to que ‘Zing onlyTO complete task you will need to and critique relevant elements Of the CPG and case study whilst upholding the National Palliative Care Standards at least one Of:- NSQHS- NMBA standards and/orFAQsAs the rubric states if you provide Outstanding knowledge of themes and principles associated with palliative care this will demonstrate an outstanding application of your knowledge to praetiee therefore using Stan-dares ‘ram mere than one of the above ane relating them together to uphold your critique of the patient eare and support the clinical practice guidelineUsing not provide Strong application However, a Of multiple standards that as registered nurses we are required to uphold will absolutely demonstrate very strong knowledge and understanding, if you link them together well with evidence based practice (E8P)Where do find Of standards?You should be aware of all 04 the standards above ag they have been discussed in many units throughout your degree, so now it ig time to demonstrate your knowledge and bring them together. to aggist you We have provided linkg below to each of the standards we would like to utilise in your critique.Eight National safety and Quality Health Service Standards to provide a nationally consistent level of eare that can be expected by all eonsumers from all health organisatiensSeven Standards that all Registered nurgeg must uphold to ensure that they maintain their registration anci provide pergan eentred and evidence based preventative, curative, supportive, formative and palliative elements to their praetieeNationa,/ Palliative Care StandardsNine National palliative Care gtandar8s that you knew well ag they have Formed the framework of NRSG374 and were fundamental for assessment task 1 standards to the case study?

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services