CLBE 304 Cloud and Beyond 101314 Urban Management Practice cognitive behaviouraltherapy Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Housekeepin…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 1 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051ASSESSMENT BRIEF
COURSE: Bachelor of Information Technology
Unit Code:
Cloud and Beyond
Unit Title:
CLBE 304
Type of Assessment:
Assessment 2 (Group Assignment)
5000 words
Unit Learning Outcomesaddressed:
a) Understand the common terms and definitions of cloud computingmodels, architectures and technologiesb) Critically analyse the technical capabilities and business benefits ofvirtualisation and cloud computingc) Evaluate various service delivery models of cloud computingarchitecture, and the ways in which clouds can be deployed as public,private, hybrid, and community cloudsd) Discuss the governance and security challenges that clouddeployments experience, and how these are addressede) Evaluate a set of business requirements to determine suitability for acloud computing model
Submission Date:
Week 11
Assessment Task:
A written assignment undertaken in groups of three or four students acting asconsultants to an enterprise considering implementing a cloud solution in aglobal environment. Reflecting the nature of the IT industry, students will beplaced into multicultural teams.
Total Mark:
50 Marks
50% of the unit total marks
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formallysigned approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – AssignmentExtension Application Form – Student Login Required) or previously approved application for otherextenuating circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day,calculated by deduction from the total mark.For example. An Assessment Task marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for each calendar day.More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy &Procedures – Student Login Required)
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:Students are required to write a report of 5000 words on implementing a cloud solution to an enterprise in aglobal environment. Students can choose an organization from any industry (For example, baking, retail,health/hospital, etc.). Ensure to familiarize yourself with all of the task requirements.You must address the following in your report:1. Explain current business process of the selected organizations that can be migrated to cloud. Issues/drawbacksrelated to the selected processes. What benefits can be achieved by transforming to cloud?2. Discuss various requirements related to cloud deployment in the selected organization. For example, you canexplain cloud deployment models and service models with respect to the selected scenario and organization.3. Explain proposed cloud solution and justify the solution, highlighting how it will help organization to overcomethe issues/drawbacks or improve the current business processes.4. Discuss Ethical, Governance, Maintenance and Security issues related to the organization and proposedsolution5. Explain the implementation of the proposed solution including factors that you will consider whileimplementing the solution. For example, storage, speed, security, access, etc.The structure of the submitted report would be:• Title Page• Executive Summary• Table of Contents/List of Figures• Introduction• Business Process Explanation/Application• Cloud Deployment Requirement• Cloud Computing Solutions and Justifications• Cloud Computing Solution Issueso Ethicalo Governanceo Maintenanceo Security• Implementation of the Proposed Cloud Computing Solution• Conclusion• ReferenceThe word count should exclude any Appendix. Your report must include:• At least five references, out of which, three references must be from academic resources.• Harvard Australian referencing for any sources you use.Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051• Refer to the Academic Learning Skills student guide on Referencing.ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:This assignment should be submitted online in Moodle through Turnitin.The assignment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not be readableby markers.Hardcopy or email submission will not be accepted.MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):
High Distinction
Little evidence ofresearch Sourcesare missing,inappropriate,poorly integratedor lackingcredibility. Lacksclear link ofsources toarguments.
Basic and soundresearch. Basic use ofsources to supportideas, generally wellintegrated, most sourcesare credible_ May beweaknesses withparaphrasing orintegration/application.
Research- is generallythorough. Good use ofsources to supportideas, mostly wellintegrated, sources arecredible. May beweaknesses withparaphrasing orintegration/ application.
Thorough research isindicated. Very good useof sources to supportideas, well-integrated,sources are credible.May be minorweaknesses withparaphrasing orintegration/application
Thorough research isindicated. Professionaluse of sources tosupport ideas, wellintegrated, sources arecredible. Very minor, ifany, weaknesses withparaphrasing orintegration/application.
ContentAnalyses15/ 50
Lacks coherence;topic is poorlyaddressed; littleanalysis. Noevidence fromexternal researchto support thecase material.The discussion isdescriptive andpoorlysequenced.
Is generally coherent;topic is addressed to areasonable depth withsome description.External research onconcepts relevant to thecase material issomehow obvious; theconcepts are analysed toa reasonable depth.There are someinconsistencies/weaknesses with theflow.
Is coherent and flowswell; topic is addressedquite well. Externalresearch on conceptsrelevant to the casematerial is obvious; theconcepts are analysedquite well. There may besome inconsistencies/weaknesses with flow.
Is very coherent andflows well; topic isaddressed quite well.External research onconcepts relevant to thecase material is obvious;the concepts areanalysed in depth. Theremay be minorinconsistencies and
Professional work.Argument is verycoherent and flows well;topic is addressedthoroughly. Externalresearch on conceptsrelevant to the casematerial is of anoutstanding quality; theconcepts are analysed ingreat depth. Very minor,if any, inconsistenciesand weaknesses withflow.
Structure10/ 50
The report is notappropriatelyformatted; morethan two of therequired sectionsare missing.
The report format isgenerally correct but theinformation under thesections does notcompletely correspondto the requirements.Recommendations aremissing.
The report format isalmost correct; theinformation under thesections correspond to
The report format iscorrect; all sections areincluded; theinformation under thesections corresponds tothe requirementsRecommendations donot suggest specificactions and do notderive from thediscussion.
The report format iscorrect; all sections areincluded; theinformation under the
Lang &Presen 5/50
Poor standard ofwriting. Wordlimit may not beadhered to.
Basic and soundstandard of writing;some errors inpunctuation, grammarand spelling
Good standard ofwriting; few errors inpunctuation, grammarand spelling.
Very good standard ofwriting; very few orminor errors inpunctuation, grammarand spelling.
Professional standard ofwriting; no errors inpunctuation, grammarand spelling.
Referencing5 / 50
No referencing isevident or, ifdone, isinconsistent andtechnicallyincorrect. No orminimalreference list,mixed styles. Noin text citations
Basic and sound attemptto reference sources;may be someinconsistencies andtechnical errors in style.Reference list isgenerally complete with1 or 2 referencesmissing.
Good attempt toreference sources;inconsistencies andtechnical errors in style.Few inaccuracies inreference list and allreferences listed.
Very good attempt toreference sources; veryminor inconsistenciesand technical errors instyle. Thorough andconsistent reference listand all references listed.
Professional level ofreferencing andacknowledgment; noerrors of style evident.Thorough and consistentreference list and allreferences listed.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 4 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKSContent for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop anddemonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a studentmust be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends yourefer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System(Moodle). For details please click the link download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooksand information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of eachTrimester.Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwisespecifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, anypaper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “HarvardReferencing Workbook” will be penalised.Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Taskin the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it isgenerally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCINGReferences are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books,chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but notthe Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their ownresearch. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-textreferences (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Beforepreparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarismthrough Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link: search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be locatedin the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, onlinedictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, butshould not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources.Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such asgovernment departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC),or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations andgovernment departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostlyvery current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites(Why can’t I just Google?): you to La Trobe University for access to this video).

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services