Enterprise Social Networks the principal benefits of Drones Donnelley Financial Solutions endeavouring to better connect with ta…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

COURSE: Bachelor of IT / Bachelor of Accounting / Bachelor of Business
Unit Code:
ENSN201
Unit Title:
Enterprise Social Networks
Type of Assessment:
Group Assignment
Length/Duration:
2000 Words & 15 minutes group presentation
Unit Learning Outcomesaddressed:
Upon successful completion of this unit students should be able to:1. Understand the core principles and concepts of information systems.2. Describe business processes and how information systems can beused to improve those processes and contribute to business decisionmaking.3. Understand how information systems work, to a level where newmaterial can be learned without requiring formal training.4. Work effectively as part of a team in the production of a groupreport; understand and communicate effectively organizational andmanagement information in a business context.
Submission Date:
Report: Week 10 Presentation: Week 11
Assessment Task:
Group Report: Find a global case study which narrates theoperations of e-commerce site (e.g. google play store), asdetailed below in the Assessment Description.Group Oral Presentation: Working in a group of 4 students, you will give anoral presentation based on your Group report, as detailed below in theAssessment Description.
Total Mark:
Group Report: 100 marksGroup Oral Presentation: 100 marks
Weighting:
Group Report: 30%Group Oral Presentation: 10%Total: 40 (30 for Report and 10 for Presentation)
Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formallysigned approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM –Assignment Extension Application Form – Student Login Required) or previously approvedapplication for other extenuating circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penaltyper calendar day,calculated by deduction from the total mark.For example. An Assessment Task marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for each calendarday.More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy &Procedures – Student Login Required)
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 7 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:This is a group assignment. Students are required to form a group of 4 (Four) students chosen amongthem and submit the group names to the lecturer by week 4.A. Group Report:You are required to find a global case study which narrates the operations of e-commerce site (e.g.google play store). Get the approval from your lecturer for your selected case study. Write a report of2000 words following the below sections with evidences:a. Introductionb. Organisation Overviewc. Business Modeld. Website
I.
Website contents
II.
Hardware Infrastructure
III.
Software
IV.
Security issues
V. Payments/Transaction processe. Discussion/Recommendationsf. Conclusiong. Individual Contribution (one page summary of each member’s tasks and deliverables)h. Referencei. AppendixB. Presentation:Working with the same group members, you will give an oral presentation.If you are absent from the class at your presentation time, you will get zero for this assessment,unless you have a medical certificate or other extenuating circumstances. Please talk to your tutorbefore the due date.There will be 4 speakers, 8-10 slides and an allocated 15 minutes to present.Use PowerPoint to create the presentation. Save it on a USB so you are ready to present in class.As this is a group assignment, 50% of the grade will be moderated by peer assessment. Every teammember individually must assess their contribution and the contribution of other team members.Please complete Self and Peer Evaluation form (see Appendix A) and submit a copy to yourlecturer on the day of presentation.Academic Learning Skills staff will give a workshop in class about Oral Presentations, which will be veryhelpful for this assessment.ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:1. Group ReportThis is a group activity and students are required to work with their respective group members.No individual submission will be accepted.You will not receive any marks for this assignment if your group members collectively reportKent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 7 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051against you for non-participation or non-cooperation. You have to nominate someone as your groupleader to coordinate the assignment submission.The report will be submitted online in Moodle by one member of the team ONLY on SundayWeek 10. You have to nominate someone as your group leader to coordinate the assignmentsubmission.2. Group Oral PresentationThis assessment is a group activity and students are required to work with their respectivegroups. No individual submission will be accepted.You will not receive any marks for this assignment if your group members collectively reportagainst you for non-participation or non-cooperation.GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKSContent for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points andconclusion.Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must developand demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presentedby a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kentstrongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available onthe Kent Learning Management System (Moodle). For details please click the linkhttp://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and download the file titled“Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and informationthat are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of eachTrimester.Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unlessotherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specificAssessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting asatisfactory standard and possibly be failed.Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the“Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for theAssessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance tothe word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than thestated length.GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCINGReferences are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such asbooks, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as areference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student iscapable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’sunderstanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include thespecific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or owncontribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) byclicking on the following link: link:http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles canbe located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage.Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 4 of 7 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gainknowledge about a topic, but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% ofyour total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where theseare produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as theNational Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), or international organisations such as theWorld Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments producepeer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The contentof the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites (Why can’t Ijust Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 5 of 7 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): PRESENTATION
Fail 0-19.9
Pass 20-25
Credit 26-30
Distinction 31-35
High Distinction 36-40
Content/40
Poor introduction, bodyand conclusion. Purpose isunclear. Main ideasunclear; structure of themain body incomplete.Conclusion/recommendations are missing. Thepresentation less than 8 orgreater than 17 mins.
Basic introduction, bodyand conclusion. Purpose madesomewhat clear and partiallyachieved. Basic and soundideas; structure of the mainbody somewhat complete.Conclusion/ recommendationsare missing or irrelevant to themain ideas. Presentation time13 – 15 mins.
Good introduction, bodyand conclusion. Purpose madeclear and achieved. Good ideas; thestructure of the main body is almostcomplete. Conclusion summarizespresentation; recommendationsrelevant/derive from the mainideas. Presentation time13 – 15 mins.
Very good introduction,body and conclusion. Purposemade clear and achieved. Verygood ideas; the structure of themain body is complete. Conclusionsummarizes presentation;recommendations derive from themain ideas; suggest specificactions. Presentation time13- 15 mins.
Excellent introduction,body and conclusion.Purpose made very clearand achieved. Excellentideas; the structure ofthe main body iscomplete; the ideas arethoroughly analysed.Presentation time13 – 15 mins.
Fail 0-9.9
Pass 10- 12.5
Credit 13-14.5
Distinction 15-16.5
High Distinction 17-20
Presentation/20
Poor use of voice, nonverbal communicationand language by all teammembers. No eyecontact. Full text wasread from slides ornotes. Nervousnessindicated lack of practice.
Basic and sound use of voice,non-verbal communicationand language by some of teammembers. Some eye contact.Some evidence of practice;great part of the text was readfrom slides or notes.
Good use of voice, non- verbalcommunication and language.Adequate eye contact. Confidentpresentation evidences practice;only a small part of the text wasread from slides or notes.
Very good use of voice, nonverbal communication andlanguage. Very good eye contact.Confident presentation evidencespractice; very limited part of thetext was read from slides ornotes.
Excellent use of voice,non-verbalcommunication andlanguage. Excellenteye contact.Obviously wellrehearsed anddelivered.
Fail 0-9.9
Pass 10-12.5
Credit 13-14.5
Distinction 15-16.5
High Distinction 17-20
Use of VisualAids/20
No visual aids used orvisual aids were poorlydesigned and did not aidcomprehension.
Sound use of visual aids;adequate to aidcomprehension.
Good use of visual aids;well designed and aidedcomprehension.
Very good use of visualaids; well designed and aidedcomprehension.
Excellent use of visualaids that aidedcomprehension.Appropriate amount ofinformation on slides
Fail 0-9.9
Pass 10-12.5
Credit 13-14.5
Distinction 15-16.5
High Distinction 17-20
Professionalism/20
All team members werein informal attire and style;did not conform todirections; disorganized;unprepared; unfamiliarwith the order ofinformation in slides.
Some of team members were ininformal attire and style;somehow prepared and familiarwith the order of information inslides.Not equal participation by allteam members .
Most of the team members were informal attire and style; most ofadequately prepared and familiarwith the order of information inslides.Not equal participation by all teammembers.
All team members were in formalattire and style; most of wellprepared. Almost all teammembers participated equally inpresentation.
All team members werein formal attire and style;well prepared. All teammembers participatedequally in presentation.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 6 of 7 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): REPORT
MarkingCriteria.
Fail (0-9.5)
Pass (10-12.5)
Credit (13-14.5)
Distinction (15-16.5)
High Distinction (17-20)
Research/20
Little evidence ofresearch. Sources aremissing, inappropriate,poorly integrated orlacking credibility. Lacksclear link of sources toarguments.
Basic and sound research. Basicuse of sources to support ideas,generally well-integrated, mostsources are credible. May beweaknesses with paraphrasingor integration/application.
Research is generally thorough.Good use of sources to supportideas, mostly well integrated,sources are credible. May beweaknesses with paraphrasing orintegration/ application.
h
Thorough research is indicated. Verygood use of sources to support ideas,well- integrated, sources are credible.May be minor weaknesses withparaphrasing orintegration/application.
Thorough research is indicated.Professional use of sources to supportideas, well integrated, sources arecredible. Very minor, if any, weaknesseswith paraphrasing orintegration/application.
0-14.5
15- 18.5
19 -22.5
23-26.5
27-30
Content /Analysis/30
Lacks coherence; topic ispoorly addressed; littleanalysis. No evidencefrom external research tosupport the casematerial. The discussionis descriptive and poorlysequenced.
Is generally coherent; topic isaddressed to a reasonabledepth with some description.External research on conceptsrelevant to the case material issomehow obvious; theconcepts are analysed to areasonable depth. There aresome inconsistencies/weaknesses with the flow.
Is coherent and flows well; topic isaddressed quite well. Externalresearch on concepts relevant to thecase material is obvious; theconcepts are analysed quite well.There may be some inconsistencies/weaknesses with flow.
Is very coherent and flows well;topic is addressed quite well.External research on conceptsrelevant to the case material isobvious; the concepts are analysedin depth. There may be minorinconsistencies and weakness withflow.
Professional work. Argument is verycoherent and flows well; topic is addressedthoroughly. External research on conceptsrelevant to the case material is of anoutstanding quality; the concepts areanalysed in great depth. Very minor, if any,inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow.
Fail (0-9.5)
Pass (10-12.5)
Credit (13-14.5)
Distinction (15-16.5)
High Distinction (17-20)
Structure/20
The report is notappropriately formatted;more than two of therequired sections aremissing.
The report format is generallycorrect; the information underthe sections does not completelycorrespond to the requirements.Recommendations are missing.
The report format is almost correct;the information under thesections correspond to almost allthe requirements.Recommendations are missing or donot suggest specific actions.
l
The report format is correct; allsections are included; the informationunder the sections corresponds to therequirements Recommendations donot suggest specific actions and donot derive from the discussion.
The report format is correct; allsections are included; theinformation under the sectionscorresponds to the requirementsRecommendations do suggestspecific actions and derive from thediscussion
Fail (0 – 7)
Pass (7.5 -.9)
Credit (9.5 -11)
Distinction (11.5 – 13)
High Distinction (13.5-15)
Language/Presentation/15
Poor standard of writing.Word limit may not beadhered to.
Basic and sound standard ofwriting; some errors inpunctuation, grammar andspelling
Good standard of writing; fewerrors in punctuation, grammar andspelling.
Very good standard of writing; veryfew or minor errors in punctuation,grammar and spelling.
Professional standard of writing; no errorsin punctuation, grammar and spelling.
Referencing/15
No referencing isevident or, if done, isinconsistent andtechnically incorrect. Noor minimal referencelist, mixed styles.
Basic and sound attempt toreference sources; may be someinconsistencies and technicalerrors in style. Reference list isgenerally complete with 1 or 2references missing.
Good attempt to reference sources;inconsistencies and technical errorsin style. Few inaccuracies inreference list and all referenceslisted.
Very good attempt to referencesources; very minor inconsistenciesand technical errors in style. Thoroughand consistent reference list and allreferences listed.
Professional level of referencing andacknowledgment; no errors of styleevident. Thorough and consistentreference list and all references listed.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 7 of 7 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051Appendix AEnterprise Social NetworksGroup Oral PresentationSelf and Peer Evaluation FormGroup No. ________ Assessment No. 2 Date ________
Name ofGroup Member[include yourself]
No. of meetingsattended[e.g. 2/3]
Role (contribute ideas, leadership, type report,prepare presentation, etc.)
Overall ContributionMajor/ Minor/ None
Points[0 to 100]
1.
2.
3.
4.
Comments:

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER