HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
HOLMES INSTITUTE
FACULTY OF
HIGHER
EDUCATION
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester
T2 2020
Unit Code
HA2022
Unit Title
Business Law
Assessment Type
Group assignment
Assessment Title
Written Report
Purpose of the
assessment (with
ULO Mapping)
Students are required to resolve two case problem type questions from a list of
case problem questions provided from the prescribed textbook using IRAC
method, based on topics discussed in lectures.
Case problem type questions include:
• Contract Law
• The Law of Torts and Negligence
• Applications of Negligence to Business
Weight
25% of the total assessments
Total Marks
25 marks for Written report
Word limit
Not more than 2000 words
Due Date
Friday Week 10 – 11.59pm
Submission
Guidelines
All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed
Assignment Cover Page.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font
and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section
headings and page numbers.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.
Page 2of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Assignment Specifications
Purpose:
This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with their chosen
case problem type questions and are able to apply the legal knowledge to factual situations,
through written and/or oral communication, to achieve a reasoned conclusion. The ability to
identify the relevant legal issues from a factual situation and the application of statute and case
law involves the use of problem solving and decision making skills.
Details:
Topics and presentation schedule:
Please organise yourselves into groups of 4 students or less.
Written report – worth 25% and must be submitted – Friday, Week 10 at 11.59pm.
• This group assignment consists of 2 parts. Part A is a case study on Contract law, and Part
B is a question involving Civil Liability (the Law of Torts and Negligence). Both questions
must be answered.
• The total word limit for the group report is 2,000 words. Each part has a maximum word
count of 1,000 words.
• The total word count for the report as well as each part must be clearly written on the cover
sheet of the assignment. Your assignment will not be marked if the word counts are not
written on the cover sheet.
• For your group report, choose the following case studies from the textbook (1 case for Part
A and 1 case for part B). Please email the Unit Coordinator before the end of week 6 for
approval of your cases.
PART A: Contract Law
Questions
• Select one of the following questions for Part A, from either from the 10th or 11th edition of
the textbook Business Law, Gibson (& Osborne)
• 10th edition of Business Law – Chapter 11 – Q1, 2, 3 or 4 (p.305-306)
• 11th edition of Business Law – Chapter 4 – Q1, 2, 3 or 4 (p. 203,)
1) In not more than 1,000 words, answer the above legal case question using the IRAC
(Issue, Rule, Application and Conclusion) method.
2) Your answer must be supported by relevant law and cases decided by Australian courts
(preferably the High Court) and/or scholarly articles. A minimum of three scholarly, genuine
and relevant references are required for this part of the report.
3) Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part A question.
Page 3of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
PART B: The Law of Torts and Negligence Questions
• For Part B, you can either select the case Esanda Finance v Peat Marwick Hungerfords for
your report (a short summary of the case can be found in the 10th edition Business Law,
p.148-149, or in the 11th edition on page 355, and the full transcript of the High Court case
can be found on https://jade.io/article/68027) or;

Alternatively, select the following question for part B – either from the 10th or 11th edition of
Business Law
• 10th edition of Business Law, Chapter 5, q.5 (p.171)
• 11th edition of Business Law, Chapter 8, q.5 (p.378)
1. In not more than 1,000 words, answer the above legal case question using the IRAC
(Issue, Rule, Application and Conclusion) method.
2. Your answer must be supported by relevant law and cases decided by Australian courts
(preferably the High Court) and/or scholarly articles. A minimum of three scholarly, genuine
and relevant references are required for this part of the report.
3. Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part B question.
Assignment structure is to be written as a report format. It must include:
• Cover page
• Table of contents
• Part A – Contracts Law question
• Part B – Torts and Negligence question
• Paragraphing
• Page numbers
• Reference list at the end of the report
Important Reminders:
Lecturer approval of chosen case:
1. You must email your lecturer your list of group members and chosen case by week 6.
2. You must obtain approval by email from your lecturer of your group and chosen case
before starting work on it. You must NOT start work on your group assignment until your
lecturer approves your group and case. Please note: failure to obtain lecturer approval will
result in a failing mark for the entire group for this assignment.
Submission:
1. All group report submissions must be done online and run through SafeAssign. No hard
copies are to be submitted. Only one group member needs to submit for the whole group.
Page 4of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
2. Please fill in the “Rubric Group Report” sheet (available in Blackboard under “Assignments
and Due dates) and attach as a cover sheet to your group report and upload on
Blackboard.
3. Each group must email a ‘’Peer Evaluation of Individual Participation in Group Assignment”
sheet to their lecturer (available in Blackboard under “Assignments and Due dates).
4. Non-submission of either the group report on Blackboard/SafeAssign is equivalent to nonsubmission, which will merit a mark of 0 (zero) for the group assignment.
5. This is a group assignment and is meant to be worked on in groups. Groups of more than 4
members will receive a penalty of 50% from the total final mark unless an exemption is
given by the Unit Coordinator.
6. Reports must be submitted via SafeAssign on Blackboard and show a similarity percentage
figure. Any group report that does not show a SafeAssign similarity percentage will not be
marked and be required to re-submit.
7. Late submissions will be subject to Holmes Institute policy on student assessment
submission and late penalties (please refer to subject outline and Student handbook).
8. Assignments are expected to observe proper referencing in accordance with a generally
accepted system of citation (ex, Australian Guide to Legal Citation or Harvard System). A
properly referenced assignment showing in-text citation is critical to passing and obtaining
a good mark in the group assignment.
SafeAssign similarity percentage:
1. Plagiarism in any form, shape or manner is unacceptable under any circumstances and
will be dealt with according to Institute policy on plagiarism.
2. In general, for written reports, a SafeAssign similarity percentage of 25% or below is
acceptable. Regardless of the similarity figure, all group reports must use in-text citation
and observe proper referencing rules.
Identification of individual work:
1. To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students
are responsible for the academic integrity of all components of the assignment, each
group must complete the following table which identifies which student/students are
responsible for the various sections of the assignment:
Assignment section
Student/Students
Page 5of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
This table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory
component required before any grading is undertaken.
Marking criteria
Weighting (%)
Group Report
– Identification of material facts involved in problem question
5%
– Identification of legal issues / legal question and relevant law
5%
– Thorough yet succinct application of law to material facts
7%
– Citation and referencing
5%
– Professional quality
3%
TOTAL Weight
25%
Page 6of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Marking Rubric
Group Report
Total marks
available: 25 marks
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Identification of
material facts
involved in problem
question
5 marks
4.3 to 5 marks
Completely
identifies all
relevant facts of
case
3.5 to 4.2 marks
Identifies most of
the relevant facts
of case
2.5 to 3.4 marks
Identifies the basic
relevant facts of
the case but
misses other
relevant facts
Below 2.5 marks
Does not identify
relevant facts of case
Identification of
legal issues / legal
question and
relevant law
5 marks
4.3 to 5 marks
Correctly identifies
all relevant legal
issues and are
stated in the form of
questions.
Correctly identifies
relevant and
appropriate legal
rules and case law,
and states them in
the form of
statements
3.5 to 4.2 marks
Issues correctly
identified, but may
contain
extraneous
information and
are not stated in
the form of
questions.
Legal rules and
case law correctly
identified, but may
contain
extraneous info
and are not in the
form of
statements.
2.5 to 3.4 marks
Issues are not
completely
identified.
Legal rules and
case law not
correctly
identified.
Below 2.5 marks
Identifies incorrect or
irrelevant issues.
Identifies incorrect or
irrelevant legal rules
and case law.
Thorough yet
succinct application
of law to material
facts
7 marks
5.7 to 7 marks
Correctly identifies
facts; wellreasoned
discussion relating
facts to the rules
and case law.
4.5 to 5.6 marks
Correctly identifies
facts. Not well
reasoned.
3.5 to 4.4 marks
Facts not correctly
identified. Analysis
incoherent.
Below 3.5 marks
No analysis.
Citation and
referencing
(including minimum
number of
references)
5 marks
4.3 to 5 marks
Correctly cites
minimum of 6
references, in-text
and in reference list.
3.5 to 4.2 marks
Has minimum of 6
references; or has
occasional errors in
formatting of in
text citations and
reference list
2.5 to 3.4 marks
Does not have
minimum of 6
references or
contains errors in
formatting of
intext citations and
reference list
Below 2.5 marks
No referencing either
in-text or in reference
list; or cites
inappropriate
references; or all
references not cited in
the correct format.
Page 7of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Professional quality
including language
use and writing
style
3 marks
2.6 to 3 marks
Professional
language. No
grammatical,
punctuation or
spelling errors.
1.9 to 2.5 marks
Some mistakes.
Does not detract
from
understanding.
1.2 to 1.8 mark
Many mistakes.
Detracts from
understanding.
Sloppy.
0 to 1.1 mark
Reflects no real effort.
Deductions
Excess word count
(1 mark for every 25
words over)
Under the word limit
(1 mark for every 25
word under)
Lacks minimum of 6
references (1 mark
for every missing
reference)
Academic Integrity
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is
integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all
assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories
of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to
your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and
support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on
Blackboard.
Academic Integrity breachesare a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range fromdeduction
of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation
of course enrolment.
Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breaches
Plagiarism
Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution.
When a student submits their own work on multiple
occasions this is known as self-plagiarism.
Collusion
Working with one or more other individuals to complete an
assignment, in a way that is not authorised.
Copying
Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with
or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take
reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work
from being copied, this may also be considered an offence.
Page 8of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Impersonation
Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to
present as oneself, in an in-person examination.
Contract cheating
Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task,
generally in exchange for money or other manner of
payment.
Data fabrication and
falsification
Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting
false conclusions, including manipulating images.
Source: INQAAHE, 2020

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Snyder v. Phelps.
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER