Health intervention in a specific population Reading Modern Society CRM3540 Marking Criteria CRM3540 – Gangs and Groups Offendin…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

PUBH6000 Assessment 2 Brief Ι December 2020 Page 1 of 5
Public Health Program
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title
PUBH6000: Social, Behavioural and Cultural Factors in Public Health
Assessment
Assessment 2: Report ‐ Health intervention in a specific population
Individual/Group
Individual
Length
1,500 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes
This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:
1. Analyse population health outcomes and the major social,
economic, political and cultural forces that contribute to health
inequalities.
2. Apply theoretical frameworks and models to analyse population
health.
3. Apply theoretical frameworks to develop effective health promotion
interventions.
4. Demonstrate clear and assertive communication across a range of
settings and situations.
Submission
For 12-week Class
Due: End of Module 6.1, Sunday of week 11 at 11:55pm*
For 6-week Intensive class:
Due: End of Module 6.1, Sunday of week 5 at 11:55pm*
Weighting
45%
Total Marks
100 marks
*Please Note: This time is Sydney time (AEST or AEDT).
Please convert to your own time zone (e.g. Adelaide = 11:25pm)
PUBH6000 Assessment 2 Brief Ι December 2020 Page 2 of 5
Public Health Program
Instructions
Read the scenario provided by your lecturer and develop a report draw from your critical analysis and
applying theory into practice. The scenario will be provided separately.
1. Seek further information to provide a brief context of the population in the scenario and assess the
potential health problem among the population based on the given scenario and context.
2. Use the Ecological Model to analyse factors relevant to the scenario that influence health behaviours
and health outcomes of the population in the following perspectives
• Intrapersonal level
• Interpersonal level
• Community level
3. Critically recommend a health intervention(s) that would be appropriated to address those key social
determinants and scenario context.
Please read the guidance on how to develop this assessment in the template.
It is compulsory to use the assessment template which is attached with the scenario of
assessment 2.
PUBH6000 Assessment 2 Brief Ι December 2020 Page 3 of 5
Public Health Program
Assessment Criteria
Criteria
Mark
Demonstrate understanding of potential health issue within a specific population (scenario)
20%
Apply Ecological Model to analyse social determinants of health issue within specific
population and evaluate influence of those factors on health behaviours and health
outcomes of the population
35%
Apply theory and model of health intervention to propose a recommendation for public
health practice in scenario context
35%
Assessment fulfils general academic standards and general criteria
• Provide an introduction and conclusion
• Comply with academic standards of writing, including legibility, spelling, presentation
and grammar
• Includes at least 10‐12 scholarly sources for this assessment.
• Use appropriate APA 6th style for citing and referencing research
• Uphold standards of academic integrity, as demonstrated by an acceptable report
from text matching software (Safe Assign).
10%
Format:
• Use specific template for this assessment
• Use headings as suggested in the template
• Font style : Arial or Tahoma
• Font size: 10 for paragraph, 12 for headings
• Font colour: Black
• Space: 1.5
• DO NOT include running head, table of content, executive summary/abstract
Figures and tables
All figures and tables derived from other works must be presented with citation using APA 6th style
PUBH6000 Assessment 2 Brief Ι December 2020 Page 4 of 5
Public Health Program
Marking Rubric
Assessment Attributes
Fail (Unacceptable)
0-49%
Pass (Functional)
50-64%
Credit (Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction (Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction (Exceptional)
85-100%
Grade Description
(Grading Scheme)
Evidence of
unsatisfactory
achievement
Evidence of satisfactory
achievement
Evidence of a good level of
achievement
Evidence of a high level of
achievement
Evidence of an exceptional level
of achievement
Demonstrate
understanding of
potential health issue
within a specific
population (scenario)
20%
The assessment does
not display an
understanding of
potential health issue
within a specific
population (scenario).
There is no attempt to
explain the context of
population and potential
health issue.
The assessment displays a
basic level of
understanding of potential
health issue within a
specific population
(scenario). There is limited
explanation of the context
of population and potential
health issue supported with
some evidence from the
research/subject materials.
The assessment displays a
sound understanding of
potential health issue
within a specific population
(scenario). There is
sufficient explanation of the
context of population and
potential health issue
referred to capacity to
explain and apply relevant
concepts.
Supported with evidence
from the research/subject
materials.
The assessment displays a
thorough understanding of
potential health issue within
a specific population
(scenario). The context of
population and potential
health issue are well
explained and supported
with relevant evidence from
the research/subject
materials.
Well demonstrated capacity
to explain and apply relevant
concepts.
Extended reading.
The assessment displays a
highly sophisticated
understanding of potential health
issue within a specific population
(scenario). The context of
population and potential health
issue are very clearly explained
Mastery of concepts and
application to new
situations/further
Well supported with relevant
evidence from the
research/subject materials.
Extended reading.
Apply Ecological Model
to analyse social
determinants of health
issue within specific
population and evaluate
influence of those factors
on health behaviours and
health outcomes of the
population.
35%
The assessment does
not demonstrate an
ability to apply knowledge
and understanding of
Ecological Model to
analyse social
determinants of health
issue within specific
population and evaluate
influence of those factors
on health behaviours and
health outcomes of the
population.
The assessment present
limited ability to apply
knowledge and
understanding of
Ecological Model to
analyse social
determinants of health
issue within specific
population and evaluate
influence of those factors
on health behaviours and
health outcomes. This is
overly descriptive and
needs more supported
evidence.
The assessment presents
a good application of
Ecological Model to
analyse the social
determinants of health
issue within specific
population and evaluate
influence of those factors
on health behaviours and
health outcomes. The
analysis is reasonably well
explained and justified by
credible evidence.
The assessment presents a
excellent application of
Ecological Model to
thoroughly analyse the social
determinants of health issue
within specific population
and evaluate influence of
those factors on health
behaviours and health
outcomes.
The analysis is very well
explained and justified with
relevant and credible
evidence.
The assessment contains a
highly sophisticated application
of Ecological Model to
thoroughly analyse the social
determinants of health issue
within specific population and
evaluate influence of those
factors on health behaviours and
health outcomes.
The analysis is expertly
explained and well justified by
relevant and high-quality
evidence from credible sources.
PUBH6000 Assessment 2 Brief Ι December 2020 Page 5 of 5
Public Health Program
Marking Rubric (continued)
Assessment Attributes
Fail (Unacceptable)
0-49%
Pass (Functional)
50-64%
Credit (Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction (Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction (Exceptional)
85-100%
Grade Description
(Grading Scheme)
Evidence of
unsatisfactory
achievement
Evidence of satisfactory
achievement
Evidence of a good level of
achievement
Evidence of a high level of
achievement
Evidence of an exceptional level
of achievement
Apply theory and model
of health intervention to
propose a
recommendation for
public health practice in
scenario context.
35%
The assessment does
not demonstrate an
ability to apply knowledge
understanding of
theory and model of
health intervention to
propose a
recommendation for
public health practice in
scenario context.
The assessment presents
limited ability to apply
knowledge and
understanding of
theory and model of health
intervention to propose a
recommendation for public
health practice in scenario
context.
The recommendation is
overly descriptive and
needs more supported
evidence.
The assessment presents
a good application of
theory and model of health
intervention to propose a
recommendation for public
health practice in scenario
context.
The recommendation is
reasonably well explained
and justified by credible
evidence.
The assessment presents a
excellent application of
theory and model of health
intervention to propose a
recommendation for public
health practice in scenario
context.
The recommendation is very
well explained and justified
with relevant and credible
evidence
The assessment contains a
highly sophisticated application
of theory and model of health
intervention to propose a
recommendation for public
health practice in scenario
context.
The recommendation is expertly
explained and well justified by
relevant and high-quality
evidence from credible sources
Assessment fulfils
general academic
standards and general
criteria.
10%
Poorly written with errors
in spelling, grammar.
The assessment has no
introduction or
conclusion.
Demonstrates
inconsistent use of good
quality, credible and
relevant research
sources to support and
develop ideas.
There are mistakes in
using the APA style.
Written according to
academic genre (e.g. with
introduction, conclusion or
summary) and has
accurate spelling,
grammar, sentence and
paragraph construction.
Demonstrates consistent
use of credible and
relevant research sources
to support and develop
ideas, but these are not
always explicit or well
developed.
There are some mistakes
in using the APA style.
Well‐written and adheres to
the academic genre (e.g.
with introduction,
conclusion or summary).
Demonstrates consistent
use of high quality, credible
and relevant research
sources to support and
develop ideas.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA style.
Very well‐written and
adheres to the academic
genre.
Consistently demonstrates
expert use of good quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to support
and develop appropriate
arguments and statements.
Shows evidence of reading
beyond the key reading.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA style.
Expertly written and adheres to
the academic genre.
Demonstrates expert use of
high‐quality, credible and
relevant research sources to
support and develop arguments
and position statements. Shows
extensive evidence of reading
beyond the key reading.
There are no mistakes in using
the APA Style.

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Assessment Criteria for BSBHRM512
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER