FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay
HLSC122: Evidence for Practice
HLSC122 _ Assessment 3: Critical Appraisal Essay_ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 1 of 2
Assessment Task 3: Essay – critical appraisal of evidence
e To demonstrate your ability to critically appraise a piece of published evidence in
relation to a clinical issue. Using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), you
will demonstrate the ability to critically appraise the design and methods of a
systematic review or randomised controlled trial, highlighting the strengths and
weaknesses of the study.
Monday 17th May
Essay 1200 words +/- 10%
Completed CASP checklist attached as Appendix A to your essay
See Unit Outline Appendix A
3, 4 & 5
You are required to demonstrate your ability to critically appraise a piece of
published. Using an appropriate CASP checklist (e.g., CASP for RCTs or
CASP for SRs), you are required to use the checklist to inform your answers.
Nursing, midwifery and paramedicine healthcare professionals
Your essay should be submitted as a Word file via your HLSC122 campus tile
Assessment 3 dropbox.
Your essay should include your completed CASP checklist as an Appendix.
.doc or .docx (not .pdf files)
2.54cm, all sides
Font and size
11-point Calibri or Arial
Aligned to left margin, indent first line of each paragraph 1.27cm
As per the Individual written script template
Level 1 Heading
Centered, bold, capitalize each word (14-point Calibri or Arial)
Level 2 Headings
Optional/ don’t have to be used:
Flush left, bold, capitalize each word (12-point Calibri or Arial)
Essay Structure as per the Academic Skills Unit guide: Introduction, body,
conclusion, reference list
Quotes from references should not be used for this assessment
HLSC122: Evidence for Practice
HLSC122 _ Assessment 3: Critical Appraisal Essay_ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 2 of 2
Page number top right corner (9 point Calibri or Arial)
Name _ Student Number_ Assessment _ Unit _ Year (9 point Calibri or Arial)
Should include at least four (4) credible and relevant references (i.e., peer
reviewed journal articles or textbooks).
Age of References
Published in the last 5 years as this area of knowledge is rapidly developing.
Note that this excludes seminal (original) works, which have no age limitations.
“References” is centered, bold, on a new page. (14 point Calibri or Arial)
References are arranged alphabetically by author family name
Second and subsequent lines of a reference have a hanging indent
Presented as functional hyperlink
Double spacing the entire reference list, both within and between entries
Late penalties will be applied from 9:01am on the 17th of May 2021, incurring
5% penalty of the maximum marks available up to a maximum of 15%.
Assessment tasks received more than three calendar days after the due or
extended date will not be allocated a mark.
An assignment is submitted 12 hours late and is initially marked at 60 out of 100.
A 5% penalty is applied (5% of 100 is 5 marks). Therefore, the student receives
55 out of 100 as a final mark.
Penalty Timeframe Penalty Marks Deducted9:01 am Wednesday to 9 am Thursday 5% penalty 5 marks9:01am Thursday to 9am Friday 10% penalty 10 marks9:01am Friday to 9am Saturday 15% penalty 15 marksReceived after 9:01 Saturday No mark allocated n/a
Return of Marks
Marks will be generally returned in three weeks; if this is not obtainable, you will
be notified via your campus LEO forum.
Assessment template project informed by ACU student forums, ACU Librarians and the Academic Skills Unit.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER