LCBB4002 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTa deep dark bellowing voice harkingUNETHICAL USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AMONG NURSESCommunity Health Nursing Helping the Community

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

1
LEVEL/ LEFEL 4
MODULE CODE/ COD Y MODIWL: LCBB4002
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
ASSESSMENT TYPE/ MATH O ASESU: ASSIGNMENT
ASSESSMENT/COMPONENT/ ASESIAD/CYDRAN: 2
COMPONENT WEIGHTING/ PWYSAU’R CYDRAN: 50 %
WORD COUNT/ NIFER Y GEIRIAU: 2000 Words
SUBMISSION DETAILS/ MANYLION CYFLWYNO:
• Make sure that Your Name , Your Student Number, Your Module Title,
Assignment Title and Your Module Lecturer’s Name are clearly shown on the
front page of your assignment
• All assignments must be submitted electronically to Moodle.
• DO NOT put this form into Turnitin or it will match many similarities with
other students’ submissions.
2
BACHELORS DEGREE ASSIGNMENT SPECIFICATION (SOAC)
 Referencing:
In the main body of your submission you must give credit to authors on whose research your work is based.
Append

to your submission a reference list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have read or quoted in order to
complete this assignment (e.g. for books: surname of author and initials, year of publication, title of book, edition,
publisher: place of publication).
Late submission will result in a late penalty mark, as follows:
Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40% for first attempts and 0% for resubmissions. No work
will be accepted more than one week after the submission deadline (Academic Quality Handbook
2016/17 7.5 (5))
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Upon the successful completion of this module, the student should be able to demonstrate the ability to:
1. Understand and evaluate the concept of transferable skills and the how to adapt them to the requirements of an
organisational setting (Organisational analysis and Reflective evaluation).
2. Evaluate concepts of community and of personal development and ways of reviewing and extending interpersonal
skills (Reflective evaluation) applying theoretical concepts and creative problem solving to real situations (Praxis –
theory to practice).
Programme:
BA Business Management
Assignment Title:
Community Engagement
Hand Out Date:
The 2nd Week of Term
Submission
Please refer to the assessments schedule
deadline:
published on Students’ Hall in Moodle and
the Assessment Board on campus
3
TASK DESCRIPTION
Part B: Reflective Evaluation (outcome 2): 2000 words
Assessment Component 2 – 50%
The purpose of this task is to assess the ability of the student to reflect on practice, to relate theory to practice and to learn
from the experience. It will require the student to reflect on the development of effective self-management,
communication and interpersonal skills.
• The ability to demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature and purpose of reflective practice with reference to at
least one theoretical model of reflection.
• Detailed reflection on personal experience with reference to the organisation discussed in Outcome 1 and what has
been learnt throughout the activity and throughout the first term.
• Reflection on the relationship between relevant theory and the experience.
Follow a report structure with an introduction, reflection and a conclusion. Maximum word count is 2000. Your report must
be referenced using Harvard referencing conventions.
GUIDANCE FOR STUDENTS IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS
1. Research-informed Literature
Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is relevant to and focused on the
task(s) set. You should provide evidence that you have accessed a wide range of sources, which may be
academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal articles, textbooks,
current news articles, organisational documents, and websites. You should consider the credibility of your
sources; academic journals are normally highly credible sources while websites require careful
consideration/selection and should be used sparingly. Any sources you use should be current and up to
date, typically published within the last five years or so, though seminal works in the field may be older. You
must provide evidence of your research/own reading throughout your work, using in-text citations in the
main body of your work and a reference list that is alphabetical at the end of your work. Please use the
Harvard referencing system.
2. Knowledge and Understanding of Subject
Your work must demonstrate the growing extent of your knowledge and understanding of concepts and
underlying principles associated with the subject area. Knowledge relates to the facts, information and skills
you may have acquired through your learning. You must demonstrate your understanding by interpreting
the meaning of facts and information (knowledge). This means that you need to select and include in your
work the concepts, techniques, models, theories, etc appropriate to the task set. You should be able to
explain the theories, concepts, etc meaningfully to show your understanding. Your mark/grade will also
depend upon the extent to which you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding; ideally each should
be complete and detailed, with comprehensive coverage.
4
3. Analysis
Your work must contain evidence of logical, analytical thinking, evaluation and synthesis. For example, to
examine and break information down into parts, make inferences, compile, compare and contrast
information. This means not just describing What!, but also justifying: Why? How? When? Who? Where? At
all times, you must provide justification for your arguments and judgements. Evidence that you have
reflected upon the ideas of others within the subject area is crucial to you providing a reasoned and
informed debate within your work. Furthermore, you should provide evidence that you are able to make
sound judgements and convincing arguments using data and concepts. Sound, valid conclusions are
necessary and must be derived from the content of your work. There should be no new information
presented within your conclusion. Where relevant, alternative solutions and recommendations may be
proposed.
4. Practical Application and Deployment
You should be able to demonstrate how the subject-related concepts and ideas relate to real world
situations or a particular context. How do they work in practice? You will deploy models, methods,
techniques, and/or theories, in that context, to assess current situations, perhaps to formulate plans or
solutions to solve problems, some of which may be innovative and creative. This is likely to involve, for
instance, the use of real world examples and cases, the application of a model within an organisation
and/or benchmarking one organisation against others based on stated criteria. You should show
awareness of the limitations of concepts and theories when applied in particular contexts.
5. Skills for Professional Practice
Your work must provide evidence of your attributes in the application of professional practice. This includes
demonstrating that you are highly capable of individual and collaborative working. You must communicate
effectively in a suitable format, which may be written and/or oral, for example, essay, management report,
presentation. Work should be coherent and wellstructured in presentation and organisation.
5
MARKING CRITERIA AND STUDENT FEEDBACK
This section details the assessment criteria. The extent to which these are demonstrated by you determines your
mark. The marks available for each criterion are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the
achievement of the task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit
from development/improvement.
Common Assessment Criteria Applied
1. Research-informed Literature
10
Extent of research and/or own reading, selection of credible sources, application of appropriate
referencing conventions.
2. Knowledge and Understanding of Subject
25
Extent of knowledge and understanding of concepts and underlying principles associated with the discipline.
3. Analysis
35
Analysis, evaluation and synthesis; logic, argument and judgement; analytical reflection; organisation of
ideas and evidence
4. Practical Application and Deployment
20
Deployment of methods, materials, tools and techniques; application of concepts; formulation of innovative and
creative solutions to solve problems..
5. Skills for Professional Practice
10
Attributes in professional practice: individual and collaborative working; deployment of appropriate
media; presentation and organisation.
Assignment Mark (Assessment marks are subject to ratification at the Exam
Late Submission Penalties (tick if appropriate)
Board. These comments and marks are to give feedback on module work and are for
Up to ONE week late
%
guidance only until they are confirmed. )
First Attempt?
6
BACHELORS COMMON ASSESSMENT AND MARKING CRITERIA
OUTRIGHT
FAIL
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
VERY GOOD
EXCELLENT
EXCEPTIONAL
Assessment Criteria
0-
29%
30-39%*
40-49%
50-59%
60-69%
70-79%
80-100%
1. Research
informed
Little or no
evidence
Poor evidence of
References to a
Inclusion of a range
Inclusio
n
of a wide
A comprehensive
Outstanding
Literature
of reading.
reading and/or of
limited range of
of researchinformed
range
of
range of research
knowledge of
Views and
findings
reliance on
mostly relevant
literature, including
researchinformed
informed literature
research-informed
Extent of research
unsupported
and
inappropriate
sources. Some
sources retrieved
literature,
including
embedded in the
literature embedded
and/or own reading,
non
authoritative.
sources, and/or
omissions and minor
independently.
sources
retrieved
work. Excellent
in the work.
errors.
selection of credible
Referencing
indiscriminate use
Referencing
independently.
selection of relevant
Outstanding
conventions
largely
of sources.
conventions mostly
Selection of relevant
and credible
selection of relevant
Referencing
sources, application of
conventions evident
ignored.
Referencing
consistently applied.
and
credible
sources. High-level
and credible
appropriate
though not always
conventions used
sources
.
Very good
referencing skills,
sources. High-level
applied consistently.
referencing
inconsistently.
use
of
referencing
consistently applied.
referencing skills
conventions
conventions,
consistently and
consistently applied.
professionally
applied.
2. Knowledge and
Major gaps in
Gaps in knowledge,
Evidence of basic
Knowledge is
Knowledg
e
is
Excellent knowledge
Highly detailed
Understanding of
knowledge
and
with only superficial
knowledge and
accurate with a good
extensive
.
Exhibits
and understanding
knowledge and
understanding
of
understanding.
understanding of
understanding of
understanding
of
of the main
understanding of
Subject
material at
this
Some significant
the relevant
the field of study.
the
breadth
and
concepts and key
the main
Extent of knowledge
level.
Substantial
inaccuracies.
concepts and
depth of established
theories. Clear
theories/concepts,
and understanding of
inaccuracies.
underlying
views.
awareness of
and a critical
principles.
challenges to
awareness of the
concepts and
established views
ambiguities and
underlying principles
and the limitations
limitations of
associated with the
of the knowledge
knowledge.
base.
discipline.
3. Analysis
Unsubstantiat
ed
Some evidence of
Evidence of some
Evidence of some
Sound, logical,
Thoroughly logical
Exceptional work;
Analysis, evaluation
generalisatio
ns,
analytical
logical, analytical
logical, analytical
analytical thinking;
work, supported by
judiciously selected
made without
use of
intellectual skills,
thinking and some
thinking and
synthesis and
evaluated evidence.
and evaluated
and synthesis; logic,
any credible
but for the most
attempts to
synthesis. Can
evaluation. Ability to
High quality
evidence. Very high
argument and
evidence.
Lack of
part descriptive.
synthesise, albeit
analyse new and/or
devise and sustain
analysis, developed
quality analysis,
logic, leading
to
with some
persuasiv
e
developed
judgement; analytical
Ideas/findings
abstract data and
independently or
unsupportabl
e/
weaknesses. Some
arguments, and to
independently or
sometimes illogical
situations without
through effective
reflection;
missing conclusions.
evidence to
review the
through effective
and contradictory.
guidance. An
collaboration. Ability
organisation of ideas
Lack of any
attempt
support findings/
reliability, validity &
collaboration.
Generalised
emerging
to investigate
to analyse,
significance of
and evidence
statements made
views, but
awareness of
contradictory
Ability to investigate
synthesise or
evidence. Ability to
evidence not
contradictory
evaluate.
with scant evidence.
different stances
communicate ideas
information and
Conclusions lack
and ability to use
identify reasons for
consistently
information and
and evidence
relevance.
evidence to
contradictions.
interpreted. Some
identify reasons for
relevant
contradictions.
accurately and
support the
Strong, persuasive,
conclusions and
Highly persuasive
argument. Valid
conclusions,
convincingly.
Sound, convincing
recommendations,
conclusions
conclusions and
justifiable
conclusions /
where relevant
recommendations,
recommendations.
recommendations.
where relevant
Limited or no
use
Rudimentary
An adequate
A good and
A very good
An advanced
Outstanding levels
4. Practical
Application and
of methods,
application of
awareness and
appropriate
application of
a
application of a
of application and
materials,
tools
methods, materials,
mostly appropriate
application of
range of methods,
range of methods,
deployment skills.
Deployment
and/or
techniques.
tools and/or
application of well
standard methods,
materials,
tools
materials, tools
Assimilation and
Effective deployment
Little or no
techniques but
established
materials, tools
and/or techniques.
and/or techniques.
development of
without
methods, materials,
and/or techniques.
Very
good
of appropriate
appreciation
of the
The context of the
cutting edge
consideration and
tools and/or
Good appreciation
consideration of the
context of the
application is well
processes and
methods, materials,
competence. Flawed
techniques.
of the context of the
context of the
application.
considered, with
techniques.
appreciation of the
Basic appreciation of
application, with
application,
7
tools and techniques;
with
extensive use of
context of the
the context of the
some use of
perceptive use of
extent of skill
application.
application.
examples, where
examples, where
relevant examples.
relevant.
relevant
.
Application and
demonstrated in the
Evidence of some
deployment extend
application of
innovatio
n
and
beyond established
concepts to a variety
creativity.
conventions.
Innovation and
of processes and/or
creativity evident
contexts; formulation
throughout.
of innovative and
creative solutions to
solve problems.
8
5. Skills for
Professional Practice
Demonstrates
attributes expected in
professional practice
including: individual
initiative and
collaborative
working; deployment
of appropriate media
to communicate
(including written and
oral); clarity and
effectiveness in
presentation and
organisation.
Communication
media is
inappropriate
or misapplied.
Little or no evidence
of autonomy in the
completion of tasks.
Work is poorly
structured and/or
largely incoherent.
Media is poorly
designed and/or not
suitable for the
audience.
Poor independent or
collaborative
initiative.
Work lacks
structure,
organisation,
and/or coherence
Can communicate in
a suitable format
but with some room
for improvement.
Can work as part of
a team, but with
limited involvement
in group activities.
Work lacks
coherence in places
and could be better
structured.
Can communicate
Can communicate
Can communicate
Can communicate
effectively in a
well, confidently
professionally and,
with an
suitable format, but
and consistently in a
confidently in a
exceptionally high
may have minor
suitable format. Can
suitable format. Can
level of
errors.
work very well as
work
professionalism.
Can work effectively
part of a team, with
professionally
Can work
as part of a team,
within a team,
very good
exceptionally well
with clear
showing leadership
contribution to
and professionally
contribution to
skills as appropriate,
group activities.
within a team,
group activities.
managing conflict
Work is coherent
showing advanced
Mostly coherent
and meeting
and fluent and is
leadership skills.
work and is in a
obligations. Work is
well structured and
Work is
suitable structure.
coherent, very
organised.
exceptionally
fluent and is
coherent, very
presented
fluent and is
professionally.
presented
professionally.
Page 9 of 9

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  International business network
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER