FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay
This syllabus contains the Lesson Assignments for the above referenced course.
This course highlights the legal and regulatory environment in which people and companies conduct business activities. The goal is to equip students for the legal, ethical and diversity implications of a diverse business world so their decisions are made with knowledge to keep them from avoidable litigation.
Expected Student Learning Outcomes
Through successful completion of this course students will be able to:
Provide a thorough and comprehensive view of the legal environment of business.
Demonstrate strategic ethical decision making.
Incorporate diversity issues when making business decisions.
Explain administrative law as the basis for business regulations.
Provide an overview of contracts, torts, property, business crimes, transactions and bankruptcy.
Explain various forms of business organizations and the employment and labor laws that apply.
Demonstrate knowledge of intellectual property, environmental law, and international law.
The Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Environment of Business in a Diverse Society (1st Edition)
by Bennett-Alexander & Harrison ISBN: 9780073524924
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2012
Suggestions for getting the most out of this course:
Read professional journals and periodicals.
Participate in the course discussion forums, and learn from the experience and knowledge of your faculty mentor and fellow students.
If possible, form a relationship with someone who works in an area related to your course. Explain that you would like to obtain their insights and perspectives from time to time.
Each academic course at William Howard Taft University is assigned a semester unit value equivalent to the commonly accepted and traditionally defined units of academic measurement in accredited institutions. Credit bearing courses are measured by the learning outcomes normally achieved through 45 hours of student work for one semester unit. For example, a course with a value of 3 semester units would require a typical student to commit 135 hours of academic engagement and preparation to complete the course requirements.
This course contains a number of lesson assignments. Work through the lessons one at a time. Unless otherwise instructed, you should complete all assignments for a particular lesson in one WORD document.
When you complete all of the assignments in a lesson, submit it to the faculty for grading and feedback. Submit only one lesson at a time, completing them in sequence. Continue on to the next lesson, but be sure to incorporate any feedback received on previous lessons into your subsequent assignments – if necessary.
Final examination procedures are set forth in the Student Handbook.
Unless otherwise instructed, Lesson Assignments should be prepared in Microsoft Word® using the Times New Roman font, 12 point, single space, double space between paragraphs. Each page must be numbered and your last name and student number included on the upper left hand corner of each page.
Your lesson assignment responses should be evidenced from the course textbook and/or from peer-reviewed sources not more than 5 years old. In general, Wikipedia is not a professionally- reviewed resource and should not be used as an assignment reference. You must cite your references so that readers can verify your conclusions, and easily determine what is your work, and what is paraphrased or taken directly from other sources. Failure to give credit for the work of others in your assignments and writing projects constitutes plagiarism.
Citation Machine is an online tool to assist in proper citation of researched information. We recommend APA format, although you may use other approved formats as long as you remain consistent.
It is the policy of the University that any student found guilty of cheating and/or plagiarism will be subject to immediate dismissal from the University. All students are required to sign a Coursework Certification Form for each course. This form is provided as a link in the last lesson of each course.
Your grade will be influenced by the accuracy of your research and the quality of your writing. The extent of research necessary will vary from assignment to assignment. In most cases, your work product should not simply consist of quoting from the assigned text.
When grading your assignments, the faculty will consider three general components:
A demonstrated understanding of the material and the learning objectives.
Your ability to articulate, synthesize and analyze the concepts and issues presented in the material.
Clear and logical composition supported by examples and appropriate references.
The final grade for the course is determined by the sum of each of the grades in the Lesson Assignments. Each of the lesson assignments is weighted equally in determining your grade for the course. Total Possible Points = 800 (100 Points per lesson).
70-73 (Passing but below the standard accepted in graduate study)
60-63 (Does not meet standard for graduate study, coursework must be repeated for credit)
58 or below (Failure)
Faculty Advisors will refer to the following grading rubric when evaluating your assignments:
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the material.
Demonstrates an adequate understanding of material
Responses are generally accurate, but at times lacking coherence.
Demonstrates a marginal understanding of the material and lesson objectives.
Provides marginally complete and/or inaccurate responses showing little understanding of the material
Understanding of Material and Lesson Objectives
Work is articulated consistent with the degree level integrating or synthesizing concepts in an original and innovative way.
Work demonstrates a solid knowledge of concepts and theories with some individual analysis of issues.
Work demonstrates an elementary knowledge of concepts but lacks original thought and analysis.
Work is primarily paraphrased or quoted directly from the text or other sources.Responses demonstrate little or no individual analysis.
No individual analysis of concepts.Work is poorly articulated and/or derived entirely from the textbook.
Articulation, Synthesis and Analysis of Concepts
Work presented in a logical and coherent way supported by sound resources.Citations are composed in proper format with few or no errors.
Work presented is grammatically sound.Resources are appropriate and cited in proper format with few errors.
Work is grammatically sound with a few minor errors.Resources may be of questionable authority, but are cited in proper format with few errors.
Work contains frequent grammatical errors.Resources are few, non- existent, or may be of questionable authority.
Frequent errors in composition, grammar and presentation.Quoted material is incorporated without the use of quotation marks or citation (plagiarism).
Composition, Presentation, and References
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER