LEGAL STUDIES

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

LEGL5001 LEGAL STUDIES– ASSIGNMENT 2 – CASE STUDY / QUIZ – INSTRUCTIONSASSIGNMENT 2 – CASE STUDY / QUIZThe QuestionConsider the following cases:Donaghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (1897) AC 22Provide a brief case summary on each, examining the salient features of each case and the effect on the prevailing business law of Australia.You may also avail yourself of the “Quiz” and answer the five (5) multiple choice questions therein based upon these cases.Summary InformationCase Studies Submission Opens: NowCase Study Quiz Portal Opens: 11:pm Sunday 26th September 2021Both Submissions Portals Close: 11.00pm (NSW Time) Sunday 3rd October 2021Weighting: 10% each Case Study (x 2) and 5% for the Multiple-Choice quiz (10% + 10% + 5%)Word limit: 1200 x 2 words (2400) + 5 x Quiz questions.Submission Method (Case Studies) : Electronic copy only – via the provided link – submitted as ONE SINGLE DOCUMENT.Submission Method (Multiple Choice Questions) : Through the portal marked as “Multiple Choice Questions”. One single entry permitted.Submissions for the Case Studies are to be uploaded through the “Turnitin” portal no later than the advertised time and date.Submissions of the Multiple Choice questions are also to be completed no later than the advertised time and date.GuidelinesThere are two parts to this submission. They are as follows:The Multiple Choice QuestionsThese are designed to start getting you in the mood for the exam, and as such will be presented as a “mini exam” under sort-of examconditions. There are only five (5) of them, and they are each worth one (1) mark. All five questions will be on the two cases supplied.The portal for attempting the questions will be able to be accessed at 11:00pm 26th September 2021 and will close at 11:00pm Sunday 3rdOctober. During this week, you may access the Quiz Questions at any time you like. However, once accessed, the quiz will only remain open for30 minutes, after which time you will be logged off the portal. You have half an hour to attempt all five questions.In any case, the Quiz questions will not be available at all after the due date. It therefore makes sense to start the quiz at least half an hourbefore the closing time for the assignment.The Case Studies x 2You have limited words (1200 words each case study, 2400 maximum together) to do this assignment. The word limit of 2400 words will bestrictly enforced, with 1 mark deducted for every 100 words above the limit. Marking criteria is included in this outline. You must be succinct.The footnotes, bibliography and short headings are not included in the word count. DO NOT use footnotes to add extra information – footnotesin this unit are for referencing only.Late assignments will be penalised as follows:• Up to 3 days late 5% of the maximum possible mark awarded for the assignment• From 4–7 days late 10% of the maximum possible mark awarded for the assignment• From 8–14 days late 25% of the maximum possible mark awarded for the assignment• More than 14 days late Not markedRefer to the Rules concerning all assignments for the circumstances when these penalties may be waived. Remember that the extension tothe submission deadline is exception rather than the rule and it can be granted only in exceptional circumstances.The marker will examine whether you have:1. identified and clearly stated the salient factors of the case2. applied relevant legal principles to the resolution of these issues;3. integrated and evaluated relevant knowledge from both the material covered in this unit and your own independent research;4. developed and sustained a concise and convincing legal argument through to a logical conclusion;5. correctly referenced and acknowledged sources;6. fluent, clear, concise writing, not containing poor expression, grammar or spelling; and7. answered the specific question asked.Students should note the following:Many people are not familiar with the requirements of assignments. Basically, they are like any other piece of good writing. They must have abeginning, a middle and an end. They must be organised so that each point leads to another in a logical sequence. Headings and subheadingsare usually of assistance to the reader, who should be easily able to ascertain the logic of your arguments.Statements of fact must be supported by referencing in the proper form. Also, arguments and ideas you are adopting or disagree with must beproperly referenced. This is one of the most important aspects of your assignment, and severe penalties will be imposed if you do notreference. Be aware of the University’s rules on plagiarism. You should avoid overreliance on only a small number of sources. You are expectedto have read widely on the topics.You are not marked for your political or social views or opinions, but rather for your ability to present coherent, rational and logical arguments,properly supported by authority.You are also marked for your ability to express yourself clearly, logically and succinctly. Poor expression, grammar and spelling will detractfrom your overall mark.Many students do not also realise that the more drafts that are written, the better standard the final product will normally be. You should aimto find the time to complete at least two, if not three, drafts prior to handing the submission in. This will be especially important in ensuringthat the word limit is not exceeded.Assignment ContentThis assignment is designed to build on the case study and add two more important cases to your knowledge repertoire. The criteria are thesame as the previous study, however with each of these cases, you are required to be more succinct with your submissions.Once again, you may either follow the “mud map” provided previously as a suggestion, or you may very well follow your own mud map.Marking criteriaImportant information: The assignment will be marked according to the following criteria:Knowledge of the case (40%) You are expected to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the case. You should be able to identify andclearly state the relevant issues and legal principles and support this case, and your analysis of it.Analysis (50%) You are expected to analyse the information gathered and evaluate the relevant legal principles. You are expected to developyour argument logically through clear analysis and apply relevant legal principles to the resolution of issue(s). Your analysis should also:• integrate and evaluate relevant knowledge from the material covered in this unit;• develop and sustain a concise and convincing legal argument through to a logical conclusion; and• importantly, answer the specific question asked.Technical aspects (10%) You are expected to:• correctly reference and acknowledge sources;• use fluent, clear, concise writing that contains clear expression, correct grammar, syntax, sentence structure and spelling; and• use headings and subheadings (where appropriate), an introduction, conclusion and bibliography or reference section.Submission of assignmentsAll students are required to upload an electronic copy of their assignments via Turnitin. DO NOT send a hard copy of your assignment.Assignments must be uploaded on or before the due date. Your assignments must be submitted as either Word documents (.doc or .docx) oras text documents (.rtf). Please do not submit PDF files. Please discuss any other file format with your lecturer well before the due date.For instructions on how to submit an assignment electronically please click on the Assignments tab in the MySCU learning site for thisparticular unit. An electronic cover sheet is required and will be available in the Assignments tab together with the instructions.How to approach the essayThere is a suggested approach using the “Mud Map” provided with your previous assignment. However, this is simply a suggestion.Students are free to choose whether or not they use this approach. No marks will be deducted if this approach is not used, it is a guidelineonly. Please feel free to set your essay out in any manner you wish, as long as it is clear, and the relevant points have been addressed.MARKING RUBRIC – LEGL5001 LEGAL STUDIES
Criteria
High Distinction< 17
Distinction15 – 16.5
Credit13 – 14.5
Pass10 – 12.5
Fail9 >
Knowledge of the caseEvidence of research andpreparation, showunderstanding of legal issues.40 % of total marks.
Evidence of outstandingresearch and preparation,including numerous relevantsources put to very highrelevant use
Evidence of excellent research andpreparation, including numerousrelevant sources put to highrelevant use
Evidence of competent researchand preparation, including goodnumber of relevant sources put torelevant use
Evidence of research andpreparation, including somerelevant sources put to somerelevant use
No clear evidence of researchand preparation, including lackof or unclear relevant sourcesput to relevant use
Analysis 1Identify and comment on theissues raised.Answer the question.30% of total marks
Outstanding identification andcommentary of the issuesraised, and outstandingresponse toissues raised
Excellent identification andcommentary of the issues raised,and excellent response toissues raised
Competent identification andcommentary of the issues raised,and competent response toissues raised
Some identification andcommentary of the issues raised,and some response toissues raised
Identification and commentaryof the issues raised is missing orunclear, and response toissues raised is missing orunclear
Analysis 2Develop articulatedresponse to the issuesidentified.20 % of total marks
Word requirement met withoutstanding representation ofthe relevant facts and issues
Word requirement met withexcellent representation of therelevant facts and issues
Word requirement met withcompetent representation of therelevant facts and issues
Word requirement met withgood and/or basicrepresentation of the relevantfacts and issues
Word requirement not metand/or not met with clearrepresentation of the relevantfacts and issues
Technical Aspects 1Headings and sub headings, orotherwise well set out5% of total marks
An outstanding, professionaland distinctive communicationof currently topical message
An excellent, professional anddistinctive communication ofcurrently topical message
A competent and freshcommunication of the message
The communication is mostlyclear but the mode or delivery isbasic and/or not fresh
The communication is unclearand/or the delivery is not fresh
Technical Aspects 2Clear language well writtenwith correct grammar etc.2% of total marks
The paper is professional andoutstandingly informative
The paper is professional andinformative to an excellent level
The paper is competentlyinformative
The paper is informative to agood and/or basic level
The paper is not informativeand/or the information isunclear
Technical Aspects 3Correctly referenced andacknowledged sources, AGLCcompliant.3% of total marks.
All citations within text andfootnotes are accurate andfollow referencingrequirements set out in theAGLC. Comprehensive andcorrect bibliography
The majority of citations withintext and footnotes are accurateand follow referencingrequirements set out in the AGLC.Comprehensive and correctbibliography
Most citations within text andfootnotes are accurate and followreferencing requirements set outin the AGLC. Comprehensive andcorrect bibliography
Some citations within text andfootnotes are accurate andfollow referencing requirementsset out in the AGLC.Comprehensive and correctbibliography
Citations within are inaccurateand follow referencingrequirements set out in theAGLC. Bibliography is missing

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER