Marking rubric Network Technology and Management MIS602 Data Modelling & Database Design improve its future prospects Job Analys…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Marking rubric for the case study assignment
Total marks
/100
High Distinction
(>80%)
Distinction (70-79%)
Credit (60 -69%)
Pass (50-59%)
Limited (45-49%)
Not
demonstrated
(44%-0%)
Correct
identification of
the underlying
endocrine cause
2 marks
Underlying endocrine cause identified
Limited/partial
Underlying
recognition of the
endocrine cause
Underlying cause.
not identified
Interpretation of
the blood test
results and
clinical features
8 marks
Excellent
interpretation of the
blood test results
and clinical features;
Clear links of the
results and clinical
features to Sandra
Very good
interpretation of the
blood test results and
clinical features, with
minor omissions;
Clear links of the
results and clinical
features to Sandra
Adequate
interpretation of
the blood test
results and clinical
features, there is
omissions in the
interpretation of
some blood test
results and /or
clinical features.
Partial links of the
results and clinical
features to Sandra
Poor
interpretation of
the blood test
results and clinical
features, there is
significant
omissions and
errors in the
interpretation of
blood test results
and /or clinical
features
Ability to Link the
results and clinical
features to Sandra
is inadequate
Lack of
interpretation of
the blood test
results and clinical
features, there is
significant
omissions and
errors in the
interpretation of
blood test results
and /or clinical
features
Very little or no
ability to link the
results and clinical
features to Sandra
Question not
attempted
Total marks
/100
High Distinction
(>80%)
Distinction (70-79%)
Credit (60 -69%)
Pass (50-59%)
Limited (45-49%)
Not
demonstrated
(44%-0%)
Pathophysiology,
risk factors and
complications
20 marks
Excellent
description of the
pathophysiology of
the underlying
endocrine cause,
including 4 risk
factors and 5
complications
options. Clear links
to Sandra’s case.
Very good description
of the pathophysiology
of the underlying
endocrine cause,
including risk factors
and 5 complications
with minor errors.
Clear links to Sandra’s
case.
Adequate
description of the
pathophysiology of
the underlying
endocrine cause,
including risk
factors and
complications (4 or
less for each) with
some degree of
errors. Partially
links to Sandra’s
case
Poor description of
the
pathophysiology of
the underlying
endocrine cause,
including risk
factors and
complications (3 or
less for each) with
significant errors.
Link to Sandra’s
case is inadequate
Major lack of
description of the
pathophysiology
of the underlying
endocrine cause,
including risk
factors and
complications (2
or less for each)
with significant
degree of errors.
Links to Sandra’s
case is highly
inadequate
No discussion.
Response is
limited and with
significant errors
Part two
Risk factors and
Sandra’s BGL and
HbA1c
10 marks
Identified 4 reasons
/ risk factors and
provided an
excellent
description of
Sandra’s BGL and
HbA1c
Identified 4 reasons /
risk factors and
provided a very good
description of Sandra’s
BGL and HbA1c with
minimum omissions or
errors
Identified 3
reasons / risk
factors and
provided a very
good description
of Sandra’s BGL
and HbA1c with
some degree of
omissions or errors
Identified 2 or less
reasons / risk
factors and
provided a very
good description
of Sandra’s BGL
and HbA1c with
significant degree
of omissions or
errors
Identified 1
reasons / risk
factors and
provided a
reasonably good
description of
Sandra’s BGL and
HbA1c with
significant degree
of omissions or
errors
No discussion.
Response is
limited and with
significant errors
Total marks
/100
High Distinction
(>80%)
Distinction (70-79%)
Credit (60 -69%)
Pass (50-59%)
Limited (45-49%)
Not
demonstrated
(44%-0%)
Medications
20 Marks
Excellent Discussion
on the use of
medication linked to
Sandra.
Complications/side
effects and nursing
considerations
discussed at length
Very Good discussion
the use of medication
linked to Sandra. Most
benefits
complications/side
effects and nursing
considerations
discussed at length
Good discussion
the use of
medication linked
to Sandra. Most
complications/side
effects and/or
nursing
considerations
discussed at length
Poor discussion of
the medication
linked to Sandra.
Some
complications/side
effects and nursing
considerations
discussed at
length.
Poor discussion of
the medication
linked to Sandra.
Few actions,
complications/side
effects and
nursing
considerations
discussed at
length.
No discussion.
Response is
limited and with
significant errors
Complications
10 marks
Provided excellent
explanation of 5
complications that
Sandra could
experience if her
blood glucose level
(BGL) and HbA1c
remain high
discussed at length
Provided very good
explanation of 4 or less
complications that
Sandra could
experience if her blood
glucose level (BGL) and
HbA1c remain high
discussed at length
Provided good
explanation with 3
complications that
Sandra could
experience if her
blood glucose level
(BGL) and HbA1c
remain high –
reasonable
discussion
Provided poor
explanation of 3 or
less complications
that Sandra could
experience if her
blood glucose level
(BGL) and HbA1c
remain high;
limited discussion
Provided poor
explanation of 2
or less
complications that
Sandra could
experience if her
blood glucose
level (BGL) and
HbA1c remain
high very limited
discussion
No discussion.
Response is
limited and with
significant errors
Preventive
measures
10 Marks
Provided excellent
explanation of 4
preventive
measures relevant
to Sandra to
prevent
complications
Provided very good
explanation of 4
preventive measures
relevant to Sandra to
prevent complications
but minor omissions
found
Provided good
explanation of 3
preventive
measures relevant
to Sandra to
prevent
complications –
Provided good
explanation of 2 or
less preventive
measures relevant
to Sandra to
prevent
complications.
Provided poor
explanation of 2
or less preventive
measures relevant
to Sandra to
prevent those
complications and
No discussion.
Response is
limited and with
significant error
Total marks
/100
High Distinction
(>80%)
Distinction (70-79%)
Credit (60 -69%)
Pass (50-59%)
Limited (45-49%)
Not
demonstrated
(44%-0%)
major omissions
found
major omissions
found
major omissions
and errors found
Referencing
10 marks
APA style correctly
used, no errors.
Excellent recent (5-7
years old) and
relevant sources
used that
demonstrated wide
reading. Minimum
of 15 peer reviewed
sources
APA style correctly
used. Recent (5-7 years
old) and relevant
sources used that
demonstrated wide
reading. 14-12 peer
reviewed sources
APA style correctly
used. Recent (5-7
years old) and
relevant sources
used. 11-9 peer
reviewed sources
Major mistakes
with referencing.
Few recent
(5-7 years old) or
relevant sources. 9
-7 peer reviewed
sources
Major mistakes
with referencing.
Lack of recent (5-7
years old) relevant
sources. Less than
7 peer reviewed
sources
No or very poor
Referencing
Presentation
Writing,
Has introduction
and conclusion
with main points
10 marks
Excellent layout.
Writing is concise
but thorough. No
spelling or
grammatical errors.
Excellent
introduction and
conclusion
provided, No new
reference included
in the conclusion
Very Good layout.
Writing may be concise
but thorough. No
spelling or grammatical
errors. Very good
introduction and
conclusion provided.
No new reference
included in the
conclusion
Clear layout.
Writing may be
concise but
thorough. Few
minor spelling or
grammatical
errors. Good
introduction and
conclusion
provided. New
reference included
in the conclusion
Unclear layout.
Writing is not
concise or
thorough. Many
spelling or
grammatical
errors.
Introduction and
conclusion were
not well written.
New reference
included in the
conclusion
Unclear layout.
Writing is not
concise or
thorough. Many
major spelling or
grammatical
errors.
No introduction
and conclusion
were included.
Writing cannot be
followed. Poor or
absent use of
spelling and
grammar checks

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER