NUR 131 Marking Rubric Assignment 2 – Travel Tracker basic concept for specifying requirements basic concept for specifying requ…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

NUR 131 Marking Rubric Task 3-Poster
High Distinction
(85-100%)
Distinction
(75-84%)
Credit
(65-74%)
Pass/Average
(50-64%)
Below Average
(0-49%)
CONTENT
Content addresses all parts of
the assessment item to an
excellent level. Excellent
exploration of concepts and
well-formed ideas. Excellent
demonstration of in-depth
understanding of the main
concepts. All ideas presented
have excellent relevance to the
topic.
All parts of the assessment item
addressed at a very good level.
Able to demonstrate a very
good understanding of the main
concepts. Most ideas presented
have very good relevance to the
topic.
Most parts of the assessment
item addressed at a good level.
Able to demonstrate a good
understanding of the main
concepts. Most ideas presented
have good relevance to the
topic
Assessment item addressed at
a basic level. Able to
demonstrate a basic
understanding of the main
concepts at a basic level. Some
ideas presented have a basic
relevance to the topic.
Inadequately addresses
assessment item. Inadequately
demonstrates an understanding
of the main ideas or concepts.
Ideas are not relevant to the
topic.
10
CRITICAL THINKING
Excellent demonstration of
critical thinking appropriate to
level of education. Excellent
application of professional
practice and/or evidence base
to practice in assessment.
Constructs a valid judgment
about the article(s) and
comprehensively explains the
basis of the judgment.
Describes article appraisal in
narration.
Very good demonstration of
critical thinking appropriate to
level of education. Very good
application of professional
practice and/or evidence-based
thinking to assessment item.
Constructs a valid judgement
about the article(s)and explains
the basis of the judgement.
Describes article appraisal in
narration.
Good demonstration of critical
thinking appropriate to level of
education. Good application of
professional practice and/or
evidence-based thinking to
assessment item. Constructs
judgement about the article(s)
and explains some aspects of
the judgement. Describes
article appraisal in narration.
Basic demonstration of critical
thinking appropriate to level of
education. Basic application of
professional practice and/or
evidence-based thinking to
assessment item. Weak/
absent/inaccurate judgement
about the article(s). May or may
not describe article appraisal in
narration.
Inadequately demonstrates
critical thinking appropriate to
required level. Inadequate
application of professional
practice and/or evidence-based
thinking to assessment item.
Weak/ absent/inaccurate
judgement about the article(s).
Does not describe article
appraisal in narration.
10
STRUCTURE & PRESENTATION
Excellent compliance with the
structure of the assessment
item. Excellent summation of
key points that providing
excellent insights of the
student’s position
All questions are addressed at
an excellent level appropriate to
the level of education. Excellent
logical/cohesive development of
ideas throughout. Complies with
assignment writing uploading
guidelines.
Very good compliance with the
structure of the assessment
item. Very good summation of
key points providing very good
insights of the student’s
position.
All questions are addressed at a
very good level appropriate to
the level of education. Very
good logical/cohesive
development of ideas
throughout.
Complies with assignment
writing/uploading guidelines.
Good compliance with the
structure of the assessment
item. Good summation of key
points providing good insights of
the student’s position. All
questions are addressed at a
good level appropriate to the
level of education. Good
logical/cohesive development of
ideas throughout
Complies with assignment
writing/uploading guidelines.
Basic compliance with the
structure of the assessment
item. Basic summarising of key
points with basic insights of the
student’s position.
Some questions are addressed
at a basic level and/or some
questions are not answered.
Beginning evidence of
logical/cohesive development of
ideas in some parts of the
assessment. Complies with
assignment writing/uploading
guidelines.
Inadequate compliance with the
structure of the assessment
item.
Inadequate summarising of key
points with inadequate insights
of the student’s position.
Some questions are addressed
at a basic level and/or some
questions are not answered.
Inadequate compliance with
assignment writing/uploading
guidelines.
10
REFERENCING
Completely adheres to all
instruction in the APA 7
Referencing Guide. In text
and/or end-text referencing has
no errors. Consistently uses
high quality evidence to support
claims/assertions
Adheres to instruction in the
APA 7 Referencing Guide. In
text and/or end-text referencing
has very few errors;
Consistently uses high quality
evidence to support
claims/assertions
Adheres to instruction in the
APA 7 Referencing Guide. In
text and/or end-text referencing
to support claims/assertions has
few errors. Consistently uses
high quality evidence to support
claims/assertions
Mainly adheres to instruction in
the APA 7 Referencing Guide.
In text and/or end- text
referencing to support
claims/assertions has some
errors. Inconsistent use of
supporting references and/or
use of low-quality references
Referencing Inadequately
follows instruction in the APA 7
Referencing Guide. In text
and/or end-text referencing has
many errors. Some omission of
in-text references to support
claims/assertions. Inadequate
use of supporting references
and/or use of low-quality
references
10
ACCADEMIC WRITING &
NARRATION
Error free grammar, spelling,
and punctuation. Sophisticated
use of writing conventions was
clearly demonstrated. Adheres
to word count. Excellent audio
narration based on the guideline
given, adheres to the 10-minute
limit.
Error free grammar, spelling,
and punctuation. Very good
sentence structure. Effective
use of writing conventions was
clearly demonstrated. Adheres
to word count. Very good audio
narration based on the guideline
given, adheres to the 10-minute
limit.
Mainly correct grammar,
spelling, and punctuation. Very
few errors. Sentence structure
was of a good standard.
Adheres to word count. Good
audio narration based on the
guideline given, with some
improvements needed; adheres
to the 10-minute limit.
Mostly correct grammar,
spelling, and punctuation
evident throughout. Sentence
structure acceptable but needs
improvement. May or may not
adhere to word count. Audio
narration is not clear,
improvement is needed; may or
may not adhere to the 10-
minute limit.
Many grammatical spelling and
punctuation errors were present
and sentence structure needs
improvement. Problems with
sentence structure making it
difficult to determine meaning.
Adheres to word count. Audio
narration is absent or very hard
to hear and/or understand;
improvement is needed; may or
may not adhere to the 10-
minute limit.
10

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER