Project Initiation, Planning and Execution

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment 2 Information
Subject Code:
MBA642
Subject Name:
Project Initiation, Planning and Execution
Assessment Title:
Assessment Type:
Length:
Project Management Software Comparison
Individual, Video Recording
10 minutes (no more)
Weighting:
30%
Total Marks:
Submission:
100
Online
Due Date:
Week 10
Your task
Individually, you are required to record a 10-minute video in which you are to compare and contrast
three different examples of project management software by incorporating an accompanying set of
PowerPoint slides.
Assessment Description.
The purpose of this individual assessment is to foster students’ ability to evaluate overall project
performance and compliance with quality standards.
Assessment Instructions
Presume that you have been employed as the project management consultant for the project you
have chosen to analyse in the first assessment, and that project supervisors have asked you to
explore various project management software to determine the best suitable option.
Based on this task, you have been given instructions to identify three different software solutions
that are explicitly designed for project management and review each one by referring to the
specifications and functionalities that are publicly available for review through their various sales
communications.
After your review, the project supervisors have asked you to record a 10-minute video, in which you
are to explain to the project supervisors how each software program could assist the project
manager and project team of the chosen project in the first assessment with each of the IPECC
stages by:
• Comparing and contrasting the strengths and weaknesses of each software choice in
relation to the project you chose in the first assessment.
• Identifying the software, you would recommend for use in the project you have chosen in the
first assessment by providing the rationale for your recommendation.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
The findings presented in this video must be accompanied by a set of PowerPoint slides and be
based on a minimum of 8 sources of information such as websites, government publications,
industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. These sources must be
presented in the video in the form of in-text citations and a reference list adhering with
Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are not to be used.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Submission
Students are encouraged to submit their work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible
technical difficulties. For those students who have limited experience in video making techniques, it is
recommended to read video FAQs document that is available to you under the assessments tab in
MyKBS.
Late assignment submission penalties
Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School
“late assignment submission penalties” policy.
Number of
days
Penalty
1* – 9 days
5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks
available
10 – 14 days
50% deducted from the total marks available.
After 14 days
Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after
the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a
mark of zero for the assignment(s).
Note
Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be
given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have
been returned to students
*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be
one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty
For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of
cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions:
https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Time Limits for Video Assessments
Submissions that exceed the time limit will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is
exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the
resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
MBA642 Assessment 2 Marking Rubric – Project Management Software Comparison 30%
Marking
Criteria (__/100)
F (Fail)
0 – 49%
P (Pass)
50 – 64%
C (Credit)
65 – 74%
D (Distinction)
75 – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85 -100%
Explanation
__/40 marks
You have provided an unclear or
incoherent explanation to the
project supervisors that
inadequately compares and
contrasts the strengths and
weaknesses of each software
choice in relation to the project
you chose in the first
assessment.
You have provided a basic
explanation to the project
supervisors that vaguely compares
and contrasts the strengths and
weaknesses of each software
choice in relation to the project you
chose in the first assessment.
You have provided a mostly detailed
explanation to the project
supervisors that adequately
compares and contrasts the
strengths and weaknesses of each
software choice in relation to the
project you chose in the first
assessment.
You have provided a detailed
explanation to the project
supervisors that sufficiently
compares and contrasts the
strengths and weaknesses of
each software choice in relation to
the project you chose in the first
assessment.
You have provided a
comprehensive explanation to the
project supervisors that extensively
compares and contrasts the
strengths and weaknesses of each
software choice in relation to the
project you chose in the first
assessment.
Recommendation
__/20 marks
You have provided an unclear or
inadequate recommendation
that is supported by a limited or
no rationale.
You have provided a somewhat
suitable recommendation that is
supported by a vague rationale.
.
You have provided a mostly suitable
recommendation that is supported
by an adequate rationale.
You have provided a suitable
recommendation that is supported
by a detailed rationale.
You have provided a suitable
recommendation that is supported
by a comprehensive rationale.
Research
__/10 marks
Your research lacks focus
and/or you have chosen
unsuitable or bogus sources,
which do not link to the required
assessment task.
You have demonstrated a basic
level of research, which is supported
by a reasonable selection of
sources.
You have demonstrated substantial
research, which is supported by a
reasonable selection of sources.
You have demonstrated
substantial research, which is
supported by an appropriate
selection and range of sources.
You have demonstrated extensive
research, which is supported by an
appropriate selection and range of
sources.
Use of visual aids
__/10 marks
You have used unsuitable or no
visual aids in the delivery of your
video.
You have used some visual aids in
the delivery of your video.
You have used adequate visual aids
in the delivery of your video.
You have used appropriate visual
aids in the delivery of your video.
You have used excellent visual
aids in the delivery of your video.
Delivery
__/10 marks
Your video does not adequately
communicate all or most of the
required information.
Your video adequately
communicated most of the required
information.
Your video appropriately
communicated most of the required
information.
Your video delivery appropriately
communicated the required
information.
Your video delivery effectively
communicated the required
information.
In-text Citations
and Referencing
__/10 marks
Neither in-text referencing and
reference list adhere to Kaplan
Harvard Referencing Style.
In-text referencing or the resultant
reference list adheres to Kaplan
Harvard Referencing Style, with
some errors.
Both, in-text referencing and the
resultant reference list adhere to
Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style,
with some errors.
Both, in-text referencing and the
resultant reference list adhere to
Kaplan Harvard Referencing
Style, with only occasional minor
errors.
Both, in-text referencing and the
resultant reference list adhere
strictly to Kaplan Harvard
Referencing Style, with no errors.
Feedback and grades will be released via MyKBS.

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  THE JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER