Reflective Journal

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

8/31/2021 Reflective Journalhttps://ihm.instructure.com/courses/785/assignments/3147 1/4Reflective JournalDue Sep 8 by 19:29 Points 30 Submitting a file upload Available until Sep 8 at 19:29Reflective JournalStart AssignmentInstructionsWrite a 1500 words reflective journal . This assessment has a weighting of 30%. The assessment should be structuredunder the same headings as the marking rubric, please consider the How to prepare and submit assessment: A Guidefor IHM Students carefully as you construct your assessment.ContentReflect on three clinical situations that you experienced related to your specific area of practice.Examples of clinical situations that students can reflect upon will include at least 3 themes from the following list (but notlimited to):meeting the educational needs of the patientsfamilies and significant othersfunctioning as a nurse in a multidisciplinary healthcare teamcommunication problems with colleagues/clients/clients’ familiesclinical issuesethical dilemmasStudents need to identify their personal and professional parameters for the way they have handled the situation thatevolved from their clinical practice, reflect on those aspects and identify the learning points. Students will use Gibb’sreflective cycle as a framework for their reflection. Students should raise some suggestions/recommendations at the endthat resulted from analysing their reflection. Students will need to allocate time to reflect on their experiences in practice,explore their personal thoughts, feelings and emotions, focusing on both positive and negative aspects of the experience.Marking CriteriaCriteriaAvailablemarkAwardedmarkCommentsReflective journal entry reflects on student’s learnings andunderstanding of and integration of reflection into future practice15Sequencing and structure 5Critical analysis and synthesis supported by the relevantliterature5Writing style, grammar & referencing 5Total /308/31/2021 Reflective Journalhttps://ihm.instructure.com/courses/785/assignments/3147 2/4
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
15 pts
Reflectivejournal entryreflects onstudent’slearnings andunderstandingof andintegration ofreflection intofuture practice
15 to >13.0 ptsHighDistinction(>80%)Acomprehensivecritical analysisof a minimum of3 clinicalpractice issuesthat have beenidentified;responsedemonstratesan in-depthreflection on,andpersonalisationof the concepts,which includespersonalthoughts andfeelings and/orstrategiespresented in thejournal entries;viewpoints andinterpretationsdemonstrateinsight into theissuespresented13 to >11.0 ptsDistinction(70-79%)A broad criticalanalysis of aminimum of 3clinical practiceissues thathave beenidentified;responsedemonstrates avery goodreflection onandpersonalisationof the concepts,which includespersonalthoughts andfeelings, and/orstrategiespresented in thejournal entries;viewpoints andinterpretationsdemonstrateinsight into theissuespresented11 to >9.0 ptsCredit (60-69%)An adequatecritical analysisof a minimumof 3 clinicalpractice issuesthat have beenidentified; theresponsedemonstratesa goodreflection onandpersonalisationof theconcepts,which includespersonalthoughts andfeelings and/orstrategiespresented inthe journalentries; mostviewpoints andinterpretationsdemonstrateinsight into theissuespresented9 to >7.0 ptsPass (50-59%)A brief criticalanalysis of aminimum of 3clinicalpractice issuesthat have beenidentified;responsedemonstratesa basicreflection on,andpersonalisationof theconcepts,and/orstrategiespresented inthe journalentries; someviewpoints andinterpretationsdemonstrateinsight into theissuespresented7 to >3.0 ptsFail (45-49%)A very limitedanalysis of theclinicalpracticeissues;responsedemonstratesa very limitedreflection on,andpersonalisationof theconcepts,and/orstrategiespresented inthe journalentries;viewpoints andinterpretationsdo notdemonstrateinsight into theissuespresented3 to >0 ptsFail (0-44%)The 3 issueshave not beenidentifiedclearly;responsedemonstratesa lack ofreflection on,andpersonalisationof theconcepts,and/orstrategiespresented inthe journalentries;viewpoints andinterpretationsdo notdemonstrateinsight into theissuespresented
8/31/2021 Reflective Journalhttps://ihm.instructure.com/courses/785/assignments/3147 3/4
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
5 pts
Sequencingand structure
5ptsHighDistinction(>80%)A high level ofskill wasdemonstrated inan integrated,logical andcoherentpresentationwith nogrammar andspelling andpunctuationerrors; theassignmentstructureincluded anintroduction,body andconclusion4 ptsDistinction (70-79%)A very goodlevel of skill wasdemonstrated ina logical andcoherentpresentationwith minimalerrors ingrammar,spelling, andpunctuation; theassignmentstructureincluded anintroduction,body andconclusion3 ptsCredit (60-69%)A good level ofskill wasdemonstratedin a logical andcoherentpresentationwith somegrammar,spelling andpunctuationerrors; theassignmentstructureincluded anintroduction,body andconclusion2.5 ptsPass (50-59%)A reasonablelevel of skillwasdemonstratedwith somegrammar,spelling, andpunctuationerrors but themeaning isdiscernible; theassignmentstructureincluded anintroduction,body andconclusion2 ptsFail (45-49%)Limited skillwasdemonstratedwithsubstantialgrammar,spelling andpunctuationerrors andthe meaningis notdiscernible;theassignmentstructure isnot integrated1 ptsFail (0-44%)No skill wasdemonstratedwithnumerousgrammars,spelling andpunctuationerrors andthe meaningis notdiscernible;theassignmenthas very poorstructure
5 pts
Criticalanalysis andsynthesissupported bythe relevantliterature
5ptsHigh Distinction(>80%)The assignmentincorporated anexcellentapproach in theapplication ofcritical analysisincluding anexcellent logicaland coherentapproach to theliterature;evidence oforiginal conceptslinked to theassignment topic4 ptsDistinction (70-79%)The assignmentincorporated avery goodapproach in theapplication ofarguments andcritical analysisincluding a goodlogical andcoherent approachto the literature;evidence oforiginal conceptslinked to theassignment topic3 ptsCredit (60-69%)The assignmentincorporatedsome argumentsand criticalanalysisincluding asomewhatlogical andcoherentapproach to theliterature;evidence oforiginalconcepts linkedto theassignmenttopic2.5 ptsPass (50-59%)Theassignmentincorporatedlimitedargumentsand criticalanalysisincluding asomewhatlogical andcoherentapproach tothe literatureassignmenttopic2 ptsFail (45-49%)Theassignmentincorporateda very poorapproach incriticalanalysiswith nologicalapproach tothe literature1 ptsFail (0-44%)Theassignmentincorporatedno approachin criticalanalysis
8/31/2021 Reflective Journalhttps://ihm.instructure.com/courses/785/assignments/3147 4/4
Total Points: 30
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
5 pts
Writing style,grammar &referencing
5ptsHighDistinction(>80%)Contains 1-2 errors ingrammar,punctuationor spelling;meets APAguidelinesregardingmargins,font,references,etc.Referencesare current;consistentlyconforms toAPA withmostimportantand mostrecentresources.4 ptsDistinction(70-79%)Containsless than 3errors ingrammar,punctuationor spelling;meetsappropriateAPAguidelinesregardingmargins,font,references,etc.Referencesare current;mostlyconforms toAPAreferencingstyle;adheres toacceptableconventionswith mostimportantand mostrecentresourcespresented.3 ptsCredit (60-69%)Containsless than 3errors ingrammar,punctuationor spelling;meetsminimalAPAguidelinesregardingappropriatemargins,font,references,Referencesinclude anumber ofirrelevantresources;generallyconformsto APAreferencingstyle, bothintext andin thereferencelist.2.5 ptsPass (50-59%)Contains 5or moregrammatical,punctuationor spellingerrors;Referencesare outdatedwith somelapseswhere theydo notconform toAPAreferencingstyle doesnot alwaysadhere toacceptableconventionswith a fewirrelevantresources.2 ptsFail (45-49%)Containsnumerousgrammatical,punctuation orspelling errors;does not useappropriatemargins,font.Referencesdo not conformto APAreferencingstyle, in textand/or in thereference list;referencing iswritten in a poormanner anddoes notadhere toacceptableconventionswith irrelevantand outdatedresourcesincluded;requires a lot ofimprovement.1 ptsFail (0-44%)No skill was demonstratedin developing theassignment topic; does notuse formal academicEnglish style/constantinconsistencies of style;uses informal Englishexpressions and personallanguage inappropriate toacademic purpose;incorrect use of grammar,very limited vocabulary,inappropriate; sentencestructure often does notconvey meaning;inadequate punctuationand/or spelling; languagefails to communicatemeaning clearly,references do not conformto APA referencing style, intext, and/or in thereference list; referencingis written in a poor mannerand does not adhere toacceptable standards.

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER