Supply Chain and Logistics in Global Context Identify two organisations in an industry How to Create your Poster assignments Lub…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

COURSE/UNIT INFORMATION
Course
SQA LEVEL 11 Extended Diploma in Global Business Management
Course Level
Extended Diploma
Module Name
Supply Chain and Logistics in Global Context
Awarding Body
SCQF/SQA
Module Code
J1EP04
Faculty

Turnitin ID
25791289
Enrolment Key
SQA2020

ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Full/ Part Assignment
Full
Assignment brief IV by
Dr.Vivek Mohan
Assessor

Assignment due date

TO BE FILLED BY THE STUDENT
Student Name

Student ID

Email ID

Date Submitted

ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK
TO BE FILLED BY THE ASSESSOR
Assessment type
Marks
Marks Awarded
Task 1
70

Task 2`
30

Overall Score
100

Overall Marks achieved
 
GRADE ACHIEVED

Summative Feedback by Assessor for further improvement

Comments for REDO submission(If applicable)

GRADE DESCRIPTORS
70% and above (Distinction )
The assignment evaluated is of a high to exemplary standard. The work addresses clearly and articulately the assignment requirements and thus meets, and satisfies all the learning outcomes (either well or in an exemplary way). The work demonstrates: clear knowledge; references to appropriate academic literature; analysis; critical evaluation; and originality of argument. It is structured and presented to a high (or exemplary) standard. Referencing conventions are fully observed.
60 to 69% (Merit)
The assignment evaluated is of a good to a high standard. Substantial knowledge, comprehension and analysis is evident throughout. Arguments presented are clear and focussed with a logical structure in place. There is clear evidence of critical evaluation of a wide range of theories/perspectives from academic literature and some independent thought. The work is well-written and addresses well all of the learning outcomes. Referencing conventions are fully observed.
50 to 59% (Pass)
The assignment evaluated is of a fair to good standard. Adequate knowledge, comprehension and analysis is evident throughout. The arguments presented have a logical structure and show some critical evaluation in places, although there may be limited evidence of an independent perspective. There is evidence of some good engagement with some of the appropriate literature. Learning outcomes have been largely met and to an appropriate degree. Referencing conventions are observed.
40 to 49% (Fail/Redo)
The assignment evaluated is of a basic standard. The arguments presented have some logical structure and are supported by academic literature in most cases. The academic literature used is outside of the suggestions made in the module guide but remains limited. Little critical evaluation is evident, and the work tends more widely towards a descriptive style. Learning outcomes have been addressed in a basic but satisfactory way. Referencing conventions are mostly observed.
Fail Grades
30 to 39% (Module retake)
The assignment evaluated is of a limited standard. Limited use of academic literature and as such knowledge and argument is very weak. A simple descriptive style with no evidence of critical evaluation throughout. Over-reliance on simplistic, limited sources. Referencing conventions may not be observed. Some learning outcomes met but in a weak and simplistic way. The work is needs to be developed in greater depth and detail to move to a passable standard at this level of study
29% and Below (Module retake)
The assignment evaluated is of an unacceptable standard. There is little or no evidence of knowledge and understanding that is required at this level. Referencing is inadequate or non-existent. The learning outcomes have not been addressed fully and the work requires significant modification to bring it to a passable standard.
Supply Chain and Logistics in Global Context
Module Description
The module specializes in the main issues in International logistics, designing and implementation to underline their strategic importance to firms. The module places supply chain designing and logistics in the context of International business. When introducing the operational aspects of international logistics, the course highlights the roles of inventory management, international transportation, international payment, and information systems in a firm’s international operation. The later part of the course focuses on the designing of global supply chain to counter risks, enhance efficiency and promote sustainability.
Learning Outcomes
LO1: Understand cross functional drivers of supply chain in a globally competitive context.
LO2: Understand Multi-model logistics systems, shipping strategies, stockholding, inventory and warehousing management in a global context.
LO3: Understand supply chain management system models and techniques like SCOR and CPFR.
LO4: Analyse financial agreements within supply chain management systems and the issues surrounding tariffs, taxes and payment methods in supply chain networks.
Expectations
Materials Access
All learning materials are provided in the form of a module kit and can be accessed from the Learning Management system (LMS)
Learning Hours
Students need to be aware of their commitment requirements in regard to study time. In order to give you an indication of that, we have based the following information on the United Kingdom (UK) Higher Education Quality Assurance Agency guidelines. “The notional learning hours associated with qualifications, programmes and individual units of study are based on a broad agreement across institutions that students can expect to spend 10 hours learning on average in order to gain one academic credit unit” (QAA 2006).
Re-sit
If you do not secure a pass, please read closely the feedback and speak with your Course leader(s) or faculty. After consulting the feedback, close attention is essential to rework on the areas of weakness, and then resubmit the work at the next opportunity. As per the QAA requirements, only one REDO is allowed where the marks will be capped at a Pass.
Plagiarism
All forms of plagiarism are taken seriously, and any suspected cases will be investigated thoroughly. If a case is found proven then the work will be graded as a fail and the case will be reviewed by the academic committee.
Student appeals
There are no re-evaluations as the marks are graded and internally verified before release. However, as per our appeals policy, a student can make an appeal to the course leader which will be then reviewed by the academic committee (please check our academic policies and procedures manual for more information)
Assignment submission extensions
Students can apply for extensions via the LMS based on extenuating circumstances (if any) with evidence (proof) as per our extensions policy
General Guidelines
Complete the ‘ To be filled by the student section’ in the cover page
All assignments must be submitted as an electronic document in MS word via the LMS (Use 12 Times New Roman script with 1.5 spacing between lines)
The results are declared only if the student has met the mandatory attendance requirement of 75% and/or minimum 50 % under extenuating circumstances approved and ratified by the academic committee and the examination board
The assignment should not contain any contents with references cited from websites such as ukessays.com, styudymode.com, slideshare.net, scribd.com, Wikipedia but should contain references/citations from credible academic journal and articles.
Submit the assignment in MS word document with the file name being:
First Name Last Name _ Module Code
Example: John Smith_GM701
Checklist

I have filled the student Information columns below.

The contents of my assignment have been submitted to Turnitin and I have attached the Turnitin report

I have strictly followed Harvard Referencing Style and Citations.
Assignment
Supply Chain and Logistics in Global Context
Learning Outcome 1: Understand cross functional drivers of supply chain in a globally competitive context.PC 1.1: Critically review cross functional drivers in the context of current globalization trends. PC 1.2: Critically analyze a range of relevant theories and concepts that impact on sourcing decisions in supply chain management. PC 1.3: Discuss current issues facing global supply chains with in-depth assessment of the market environment. PC 1.4: Evaluate outsourcing strategies and develop original and creative responses to the issues surrounding outsourcing strategies.Learning Outcome 2: Understand Multi-model logistics systems, shipping strategies, stockholding, inventory and warehousing management in a global context. PC 2.1: Critically evaluate multi-model systems and shipping strategies applied globally. PC 2.2: Implement an operational project that will address international logistics challenges. PC 2.3: Conduct an in-depth analysis of the problems and issues in warehousing and inventory management in your chosen organization. PC 2.4: Prepare a comprehensive action plan to address the problems and issues in warehousing and inventory management at your chosen organization. PC 2.5: Critically review the different approaches for selecting logistics modes and choosing the best physical distribution strategies.Learning Outcome 3: Understand supply chain management system models and techniques like SCOR and CPFR. PC 3.1: Discuss two supply chain management system models and their influence on advance planning and scheduling strategies. PC 3.2: Critically analyze a wide range of ICT applications to support and enhance Collaborative, Planning, Forecasting Replenishing (CPFR) techniques. PC 3.3: Critically analyze the relationship between CPFR models and Artificial Intelligence (AI) strategies. PC 3.4: Critically discuss supplier relationship management.Learning Outcome 4: Analyse financial agreements within supply chain management systems and the issues surrounding tariffs, taxes and payment methods in supply chain networks. PC 4.1: Evaluate commercial and operational financial statements and agreements. PC 4.2: Develop a total cost strategy for the acquisition of capital equipment for an organization. PC 4.3: Critically review the impact of digital payment methods on supply chain and logistics, making mention of their features, boundaries and terminology.
NOTE: – This assignment is designed to test your knowledge and understanding of Strategic Supply Chain and Logistics Management. There are two tasks given below, and each task relates to an aspect of Strategic Supply Chain and Logistics Management. You will be required to attempt all tasks. The word limit for task 1 is 3600 and the word limit for task 2 is 1500 words. However, some questions might require more detailed answers. You must support your answers with evidence from acknowledged academic sources. Personal experiences can also be used to illustrate the application of a topic/theory, but the participants must still provide evidence from acknowledged sources to support their answers. The sessions and activities conducted during classes are not the only sources of information. You are encouraged to draw on as many appropriate sources as you can. The more you engage with the literature of the topic, the better the likelihood of achieving a higher grade/ award.
Assignment Task 1: Report (70 marks)
Case study on Starbucks
Starbucks is pretty much a household name, but like many of the most successful worldwide brands, the coffee-shop giant has been through its periods of supply chain pain. In fact, during 2007 and 2008, Starbucks leadership began to have severe doubts about the company’s ability to supply its 16,700 outlets. As in most commercial sectors at that time, sales were falling. At the same time, though, supply chain costs rose by more than $75 million.
Supply Chain Cost Reduction Challenges: When the supply chain executive team began investigating the rising costs and supply chain performance issues, they found that service was indeed falling short of expectations. Findings included the problems such as fewer than 50% of outlet deliveries were arriving on time, several poor outsourcing decisions had led to excessive 3PL expenses and the supply chain had, (like those of many global organisations) evolved, rather than grown by design, and had hence become unnecessarily complex.
Further reference for this case study: –
Logistics Bureau

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Starbucks Global Supply chain

Based on the given case study of Starbucks and their Supply chain challenges, learners are asked to prepare a report by answering the following questions: –
Provide a brief introduction on the Starbucks Global Supply chain and the role of supply chain function in the context of a Multinational Company such as Starbucks. (300 words, 6 marks)
Examine and discuss the cross- functional supply chain drivers of the organization’s business model (500 words, 10 Marks)
Develop a 10-point plan that will ensure the logistics and inventory strategies remain relevant to Starbuck’s organizational objectives in future. (700 words, 14 marks)
Discuss 3 Supply chain management strategies that are likely to aid Starbucks in achieving its goals. (800 words, 15 marks)
How can the adoption Supply Chain Management Techniques like Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment [CPFR] and SCOR aid in improving the organization’s position. (900 words, 20 marks)
Conclude your report by providing adequate recommendations as a result of your above analysis done on Starbucks supply chain. (400 words, 5 marks)
Assignment Task 2: Shipping Scenario (30 marks)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Power Plant International is scheduled to import a GT 6 Bladed Rotor. Exported in April 10th 2019, it is now ready for importation and installation at the power plant. Timely arrival is critical since the non-availability of the unit is costing the company 1 million US dollar penalties per day. The unit is scheduled for installation on November 1st 2019.
MOVEMENT SCHEDULE
Pickup and inland – 1 day
Sailing – circa 15 days
Local clearance and delivery – 2 days
VESSEL ROUTINGS
Houston / Port of Guaira / PTL
POTENTIAL LOGISTICS CHALLENGES AHEAD
1 – At the Houston port, delays in loading cargo may arise
2 – The vessel is being shipped in the hurricane season and stormy weather is anticipated on the day of loading
– Offloading from the vessel at Point Lisas port
– Possibility of damage at Houston port
– The agent or supplier not following proper lifting protocol
– Sea blast during inclement weather
– Industrial unrest at the Port of Guaira
– Unsuitable incoterms for the shipment
– Injury of workmen causing delay in loading
– Poor choice of shipper leading to damaged ship and incompetent crew
– Berthing delay due to rough seas
Freight forwarder’s plan:
Collect cargo on the 10 of October.
Deliver to Houston port on the 14th October
Load on the ship on the afternoon of the 16th October
Arrive at port in Venezuela on the 25th October
Deliver to port of Point Lisas on the 28th October
Develop and discuss a risk assessment plan for the foreseeable challenges ahead. Consideration must be given to the choice of incoterms and transport mode applied in your review. All other considerations can be explored in the shipping of the cargo. A risk assessment template will be provided for this activity, which MUST be followed. (750 words, 15 marks)
Describe the necessary shipping documents that are needed for clearance of cargo at the port.(250 words, 5 marks)
Discuss the various payment options that the client can explore, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages to both the shipper and the importer (client) (500 words, 10 marks)
Performance Descriptors
Performance descriptors indicate how marks will be arrived at against each of the above criteria. The descriptors indicate the likely characteristics of work that is marked within the percentage bands indicated.

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  CFD analysis in Heat transfer & combustionPROJECT LEADERSHIP AND THE ART OF MANAGINGMGT5PSC: Assessment 2 marking rubricRSK80003 Risk Perception and AnalysisMITS5004 IT SecurityCOMP2711/8801 Computer Programming 2A Middleware Solution for WirelessMGT5PSC: Assessment 2 marking rubricMaintain Workplace Safety

(70-100%) Work of an outstanding standard
(60-69%) Work of a good standard
(50-59%) Work of a pass standard
D (40-49%) Fail (Resubmission allowed)
E (0-39%) Fail (Resubmission not allowed)
Executive Summary and Introduction (20%)
Exemplary compilation with detailed background on concepts of HRM, its functions, linkage to SHRM and organizational performance. Mature links made between relevant ideas, theories and practice. Extensive range of relevant sources; those identified beyond classroom sessions; are used. An argumentative perspective is presented demonstrating originality and creativity in the interpretation of the scope of staffing, development and compensation. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
Competent compilation with sufficient background on concepts of HRM, its functions, linkage to SHRM and organizational performance. Sound links made between relevant ideas, theories and practice. A sufficient range of relevant sources; from among those identified in classroom sessions; are used. An evocative perspective is presented in the interpretation of scope of staffing, development and compensation. Negligible errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
Basic compilation with sufficient background on concepts of HRM, its functions, linkage to SHRM and organizational performance. Average links made between relevant ideas, theories and practice. A very limited range of relevant sources; from among those identified in classroom sessions; are used. A descriptive perspective is presented in the interpretation of scope of staffing, development and compensation. Evident errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
Weak compilation with sufficient background on concepts of HRM, its functions, linkage to SHRM and organizational performance. Superficial links made between relevant ideas, theories and practice. An insufficient range of relevant sources; none from among those identified in classroom sessions; are used. A vague perspective is presented in the interpretation of scope of staffing, development and compensation. Repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
Poor compilation with sufficient background on concepts of HRM, its functions, linkage to SHRM and organizational performance. Sketchy links made between relevant ideas, theories and practice. No relevant sources; from among those identified in classroom sessions; are used. No perspective is presented in the interpretation of scope of staffing, development and compensation. Too many errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
Affect of SHRM & HRM on Org Performance (20%)
An exceptional analysis of the literature is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information including identification and analysis of gaps. Strong linkage is established among all the organizational performance outcomes like growth, profitability, ROI, competitive advantage, legal compliance, strategic objectives attainment, and key stakeholder satisfaction. Dr. Dave Ulrich’s Strategic HR Model is clearly synthesized. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
A good analysis of the literature is developed. Summarizes and shows sound synthesis of the literature information, including identification and analysis of gaps. Good linkage is established among all the organizational performance outcomes like growth, profitability, ROI, competitive advantage, legal compliance, strategic objectives attainment, and key stakeholder satisfaction. Dr. Dave Ulrich’s Strategic HR Model is well resonated. Negligible errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
A basic analysis of the literature is developed. Descriptive presentation of the literature information. Limited identification but no analysis of gaps. Average linkage is established among few of the organizational performance outcomes like growth, profitability, ROI, competitive advantage, legal compliance, strategic objectives attainment, and key stakeholder satisfaction. Dr. Dave Ulrich’s Strategic HR Model is loosely referred to. Evident errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
A weak analysis of the literature is developed. Mere compilation of information. Includes no identification and analysis of gaps. No linkage is established among all the organizational performance outcomes like growth, profitability, ROI, competitive advantage, legal compliance, strategic objectives attainment, and key stakeholder satisfaction. Repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
A poor analysis of the literature is developed. No synthesis of the literature information. Identification and analysis of gaps is absent. No linkage is established among all the organizational performance outcomes like growth, profitability, ROI, competitive advantage, legal compliance, strategic objectives attainment, and key stakeholder satisfaction. Too many errors in referencing or grammar or syntax.
Leadership Practices (20%)
The work thoroughly examines the scenario at the chosen organization. The use of the leadership models clearly bring out the alignment of the strategic HR activities to organizational goals and objectives. Highly practical justifications are provided. Illustrations and Tables are properly captioned.
The work examines the scenario at the chosen organization. The outcomes are good. The use of the leadership models clearly bring out the alignment of the strategic HR activities to organizational goals and objectives. Some sound justifications are provided. Illustrations and Tables are captioned.
A reasonably well examination of the scenario at the chosen organization. The outcomes are obvious and average. The use of the leadership models are evident but the outcomes are descriptive about the alignment of the strategic HR activities to organizational goals and objectives. Considerable justifications are provided. Illustrations and Tables are not necessarily captioned.
The examination of the scenario at the chosen organization is not well done. The outcomes are sketchy. The use of the leadership models are evident but the outcomes somewhat fail to present the alignment of the strategic HR activities to organizational goals and objectives. Weak justifications are provided. Illustrations and Tables are not captioned.
The examination of the scenario at the chosen organization is not well done. The outcomes are poor. The leadership models are not used and hence the outcomes fail to present the alignment of the strategic HR activities to organizational goals and objectives. Failure to provide justifications.
Change Implementation Plan (30%)
An ability to successfully synthesize theoretical issues into practice and evaluate the possible implications and lessons of SHRM and Change Mgmt. Ideas are presented in a succinct manner and conclusions are well reasoned which have relevance to the scenario.
The work demonstrates a willingness to question and to explore issues and to synthesize theoretical perspectives and practical application within chosen context SHRM and Change Mgmt. Some meaningful well-reasoned conclusions and attention given to lessons learned which have relevance to the scenario.
The work demonstrates a competence to explore issues and to synthesize theoretical perspectives and practical application within chosen case context of SHRM and Change Mgmt. Some helpful conclusions and acknowledgement of lessons learned.
There may be little evidence of an ability to apply theoretical principles to the case scenario or a wider context of SHRM and Change Mgmt. Conclusions unrelated to the scenario. Lessons learned either superficial or lacking.
No application of theoretical principles to the case scenario or a wider context of SHRM and Change Mgmt. Conclusions unrelated and confused or illogical and unsubstantiated. Lessons learned either superficial or lacking. Possibly no real attempt to address assignment brief in respect of actual questions asked.
Recommendations and Conclusions (10%)
Well-organised, logical, fully supported by evidence, conclusions clear and arise from results/discussion; practical and feasible, with clear consideration of SHRM issues. Recommendations driven by good deductions from findings.
Well-organised, logical, supported by evidence, conclusions fairly clear and arise from results & discussion; practical and feasible, with clear consideration of SHRM issues. Recommendations driven by decent deductions from findings.
Reasonably well-organised, logical, generally supported by evidence, conclusions fairly clear and arise from results & discussion; practical and feasible, with unclear or weak consideration of SHRM issues. Recommendations not always driven by good deductions.
Poor organisation; gaps in reasoning; some obvious conclusions omitted for the list; other conclusions not especially driven by the findings but from ‘common sense’. No real implications and recommendations weak and incoherent.
Assertions little related to evidence, frequently illogical or arbitrary; conclusions if presented are disorganized; alternatives not considered; no real understanding of the need to draw conclusions, implications and recommendations from results.
(START WRITING YOUR ANSWER HERE…..)

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER