TACC606 _2021S2 Assignment information

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

TACC606 _2021S2 Assignment informationValue: 30% of overall assessmentDue date: Sunday 26 Sept. 2021 (Week 8)Word limit (excluding references): 3000 wordsAssignment Requirements:1) Group:Students are to form groups of 4, each student’s name must be recorded on thecoversheet otherwise that student will receive zero for the assignment. Also, the Peerand Self-Assessment of Teamwork Form must be submitted together with theassignment, especially for the groups with unequal members’ contribution.2) Submission:Students must submit the group assignment online by 11:59 pm (AEDT) on Sunday26 Sept. 2021. Only the group leader should submit online. Late penalty will be at10% per day.3) Structure:Use report structure which must contain the following: report cover page, table ofcontents, executive summary, introduction, body, conclusion, recommendations andbibliography.4) Formatting and referencing:The assignment must be word-processed, 1.5 line spacing, and the word size should be12 with ‘Times new roman’ font type. Harvard style reference preferred.You are required to obtain the annual reports of two ASX Top 200 companies in the sameindustry and write a business research report to address the following questions related to theitems included in property, plant and equipment.1. Review and evaluate the PPE disclosure of your selected companies which may include:• What range of measures is used to determine amounts for these items in the reports ofthe individual companies?• Do you think it is valid to add the items, given the measures used?• How would you interpret the total amount for property, plant and equipment in thefinancial statements?• Compare the measures used by the different companies for similar items. Are there anyinconsistencies in how similar items are measured by the different companies?2. Discuss the factors that accountants should consider when setting up company accountingpolicy relating to PPE.3. Detail your view on the subsequent measurement of PPE and provide recommendations toaccounting standard setters.Please refer to the marking rubric for marking criteria.TACC606 Assignment Marking Rubric (30 marks)
Q 1Relevance &analysis
/10

2
4
6
8
10
Notattempted.
Includes totallyirrelevant andinappropriatedetails with verypoor analysis.
Includes someappropriate andrelevant detailswith pooranalysis.
Includesreasonablyappropriate andrelevant detailswith reasonableanalysis.
Includes mostlyappropriate andrelevant detailswith goodanalysis.
Includes allrelevant detailswith excellentanalysis
Q2Analysis &synthesis
/7

1
2.5
4
5.5
7
Notattempted.
Analysis is incompleteor faulty in one ormore aspects with verypoor synthesis.
Analysis is notvery detailedwith someincorrectinformation andpoor synthesis.
Providereasonablycomplete anddetailed analysis,reasonablesynthesis.
Provide mostlycomplete anddetailed analysis,good synthesis.
Provide thoroughanalysis andexcellentsynthesis.
Q3Criticalthinking &analysis
/7

1
2.5
4
5.5
7
Notattempted.
The review isinadequate andinsufficient. Verypoorrecommendations.
The review isgenerallyadequate but withlittle evidence ofcritical thinkingand analysis. Poorrecommendations.
The review isreasonablyadequate. Fairlysufficient andrelevant analysis isprovided,demonstratingsome criticalthinking skills.Reasonablerecommendations.
The review is goodand comprehensive.Mostly sufficientand relevantanalysis is provided,demonstrating goodcritical thinkingskills. Goodrecommendations.
The review isexcellent andsophisticated.Highly sufficient andrelevant analysis isprovided,demonstratingexcellent criticalthinking skills.Excellentrecommendations.
Writing skills(includingstructure,grammar,spelling,referencingstyle,etc.)
/6

1
2
3.5
5
6
Notattempted.
Very poor structure,No clear executivesummary,introduction,conclusion andrecommendationsprovided,Very poorgrammaticalexpression andspelling errors,None or fewreferences andcitations.
Poor structure,Brief executivesummary,introduction,conclusion andrecommendationsprovided but notparticularly clear,Low levels ofwriting abilityevident, simpleexpression withmany spelling andgrammaticalerrors,Some referencesbut lacking inproper use of areferencing style.
Clear structure,Executive summary,introduction,conclusion andrecommendationsprovided but couldbe more conciseand clear,Average levels ofwriting ability withsome spelling andgrammatical errors,Appropriatereferences withsome inaccuraciesin the use of areferencing style.
Good structure,Clear executivesummary,introduction,conclusion andrecommendationsprovided,High level of writingability – clearconcise expressionwith fewgrammatical orspellinginaccuracies,Appropriatereferences with fewinaccuracies in theuse of a referencingstyle.
Excellent structure,Clear, concise andwell expressedexecutive summary,introduction,conclusion andrecommendationsprovided,Very high level ofwriting ability withno grammatical orspelling errors,References accuratewithout anyinaccuracies.

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER